History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
It seems impossible that the horsemen, the Yalis, and above all, the
great cornice of double curvature, shown in the woodcut (No. 207), could
have been brought to these fixed forms without long experience, and the
difficulty is to understand how they could ever have been elaborated in
stone at all, as they are so unlike lithic forms found anywhere else;
yet they are not wooden, nor is there any trace in them of any of their
details being derived from wooden architecture, as is so evidently the
case with the Buddhist architecture of the north. The one suggestion
that occurs to me is that they are derived from terra-cotta forms.
Frequently, at the present day, figures of men on horseback larger than
life, or of giants on foot, are seen near the village temples made of
pottery, their hollow forms of burnt clay, and so burnt as to form a
perfect terra-cotta substance. Most of the figures also on the gopuras
are not in plaster as is generally said, but are also formed of clay
burnt. The art has certainly been long practised in the south, and if we
adopt the theory that it was used for many ornamental purposes before
wood or stone, it will account for much that is otherwise unintelligible
in the arts of the south.
VIJAYANAGAR.
The dates just quoted will no doubt sound strange and prosaic to those
who are accustomed to listen to the childish exaggerations of the
Brahmans in speaking of the age of their temples. There is, however,
luckily a test besides the evidence above quoted, which, if it could be
perfectly applied, would settle the question at once.
When in the beginning of the 14th century the Mahomedans from Delhi
first made their power seriously felt in the south, they struck down the
kingdom of the Hoisala Bellalas in 1310, and destroyed their capital of
Hullabîd; and in 1322 Worangul, which had been previously attacked, was
finally destroyed, and it is said they then carried their victorious
arms as far as Ramnad. The Mahomedans did not, however, at that time
make any permanent settlement in the south, and the consequence was,
that as soon as the Hindus were able to recover from the panic, Bukka
and Harihara, princes it is said of the deposed house of Worangul,
gathered around them the remnants of the destroyed states, and founded a
new state in the town of Vijayanagar on the Tongabhadra. An earlier city
it is said had been founded there in 1118, by a Vijaya Rayal, but only
as a dependency of the Mysore Raj, and there is consequently no reason
for supposing that any of the buildings in the city belong to that
period, nor indeed till the new dynasty founded by Bukka had
consolidated its power, which was certainly not before the beginning of
the 15th century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account