History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
The city was finally destroyed by the Mahomedans in 1565, but during the
two previous centuries it maintained a gallant struggle against the
Bahmuny and Adil Shahi dynasties of Kalburgah and Bijapur, and was in
fact the barrier that prevented the Moslems from taking possession of
the whole country as far as Cape Comorin.
Its time of greatest prosperity was between the accession of Krishna
Deva, 1508, and the death of Achutya Rayal, 1542, and it is to their
reigns that the finest monuments in the city must be ascribed. There is,
perhaps, no other city in all India in which ruins exist in such
profusion or in such variety as in Vijayanagar, and as they are all
certainly comprised within the century and a half, or at the utmost the
two centuries, that preceded the destruction of the city, their
analogies afford us dates that hardly admit of dispute.
Among those in the city the most remarkable is that dedicated to Vitoba,
a local manifestation of Vishnu. It was erected by Achutya Rayal, A.D.
1529-1542, and never was finished; and if it were not that no successor
ever cares in India to complete the works begun by his predecessor, we
might fancy the works were interrupted by the siege. The principal part
of the temple consists of a porch, represented in the annexed woodcut
(No. 210). It is wholly in granite, and carved with a boldness and
expression of power nowhere surpassed in the buildings of its
class.[396] As will be observed, it has all the characteristic
peculiarities of the Dravidian style: the bold cornice of double
flexure, the detached shafts, the Yalis, the richly-carved stylobate,
&c. But what interests us most here is that it forms an exact half-way
house in style between such porches as those at Vellore and
Chillambaram, and that of Tirumulla Nayak at Mádura. The bracket shafts
are detached here, it is true, but they are mere ornaments, and have
lost their meaning. The cornice is as bold as any, but has lost its
characteristic supports, and other changes have been made, which would
inevitably have led in a short time to the new style of the Nayak
dynasty.
[Illustration: 210. View of Porch of Temple of Vitoba at Vijayanagar.
(From a Photograph by Mr. Neill.)]
The little building on the right is the car of the god, formed of a
single block of granite, with movable wheels, but they are the only
parts that move. There are, besides, either one or two pavilions,
smaller, but similar in design to that represented in the woodcut, a
gopura, and other adjuncts, which would be interesting, if we had the
means of comparing and describing them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account