History of Indian and Eastern ArchitectureFergusson, James
History
History of Indian and Eastern Architecture
Fergusson, James
Architecture -- India; Architecture, Asian
At Karli, one still stands in front of the great cave surmounted by four
lions, which, judging from analogy, once bore a chakra or wheel,
probably in metal.[57] A corresponding pillar probably once stood on the
opposite side of the entrance bearing some similar emblem. Two such are
represented in these positions in front of the great cave at Kenheri,
which is an exact but debased copy of the great Karli cave.[58]
The two lâts at Erun and the iron pillar at Delhi, though similar in
many respects to those just described, seem certainly to belong to the
era of the Guptas at the end of the fourth or the beginning of the fifth
century of our era, and to be dedicated to the Vaishnava faith, and in
consequence belong to a subsequent chapter. That at Pathari is not
inscribed or is at least unedited, and though it looks old, may also be
of the Gupta times.
This is a meagre account, it must be confessed, of Buddhist lâts, which
probably at one time could be counted by hundreds in the important
Buddhist localities in Bengal; but it is feared we shall hardly be able
to add many more to our list. They are so easily overthrown and so
readily utilised in populous localities, that all trace of most of them
has probably been irrecoverably lost, though one or two more examples
may probably be found in remote, out-of-the-way places.
There is no instance, so far as I am aware, of a built monumental pillar
now standing in India. This is sufficiently accounted for by the ease
with which they could be thrown down and their materials removed, when
they had lost the sanctity which alone protected them. There are,
however, two such pillars among the topes of Cabul, and evidently coeval
with them, now called the Surkh Minar (Woodcut No. 7), and the Minar
Chakri. These are ascribed by the traditions of the place to Alexander
the Great, though they are evidently Buddhist monuments, meant to mark
some sacred spot, or to commemorate some event, the memory of which has
passed away. There can be little doubt that their upper members are
meant to be copies of the tall capitals of the Persepolitan pillars,
which were probably common also in Assyria, and throughout this part of
Asia, but their shape and outline exhibit great degeneracy from the
purer forms with which that architecture commenced in India, and which
were there retained in their purity to a much later period than in this
remote province. No reliable data seem to exist for ascertaining what
the age of these monuments may be. It probably was the third or fourth
century of our era, or it may be even earlier.
[Illustration: 7. Surkh Minar, Cabul. (From a Drawing by Mr. Masson, in
Wilson’s ‘Ariana Antiqua.’)]
CHAPTER III.
STUPAS.
CONTENTS.
Bhilsa Topes--Topes at Sarnath and in Behar--Amravati Tope--Gandhara
Topes--Jelalabad Topes--Manikyala Tope.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account