History of Madeley: including Ironbridge, Coalbrookdale, and CoalportRandall, John
History
History of Madeley: including Ironbridge, Coalbrookdale, and Coalport
Randall, John
Madeley (Shropshire, England) -- History
Mr. Yale who presented the memorial said: One complaint was in regard
to the license put upon the rod-and-line. It was only 1s., it was
true, and that was not much, but it involved a principle which they
thought might be carried further at some future day, and to a very
oppressive extent. The greatest grievance, however, was the
imposition of licenses upon the use of night lines. He did not
believe that the scarcity of fish was owing to the anglers or to the
netters, for it was a matter of experience that when men were allowed
to go and catch as many as they thought proper there were plenty of
fish, but it was not so now. He used to think it a very bad day if
he could not catch 20 lbs. of fish, and now, perhaps he would not
take 10 ozs. That was not caused by the rod-and-line, or by the use
of nets, upon which it is now sought to place these restrictions. He
believed, as Mr. George had told him the other day, that the scarcity
of fish was owing to the pollutions, and not to the taking of fish.
SAMUEL SANDALS, made a statement to the effect that he worked all the
hours he could at his usual work and spent the rest in fishing, and
he thought it very hard to put a license upon the night lines. As to
the trout taken with night lines, it was very rare indeed that they
could take a trout in that way, except in the spring when the water
was muddy: he believed the ducks destroyed “a sight” of the spawn on
the fords.
Mr. WATTON said he did not for a moment dispute what the last speaker
had said with respect to his not catching trout on night lines.
There might possibly be some very good local reasons for his
non-success, but, speaking from his own observation, he knew well
enough that the night lines were the destruction of the trout. They
were laid zig-zag fashion for a great distance down the river, and
swept every trout off the fords at night, and they were most
destructive engines.
Mr. H. SHAW said he quite agreed with what Mr. Watton had said, and
he could bring evidence to prove that an immense quantity of trout
was taken upon night lines, and a very large number of small fish
were destroyed in baiting the lines. To take these baits stones were
rooted up and the young salmon were frequently disturbed and got
devoured by large fish. No less than 3,000 or 4,000 bait were caught
each day in and around Shrewsbury to supply the night lines, and that
must be a very serious drawback to the stock of fish in the river.
The CHAIRMAN said it seemed to him that the gentlemen who had
attended the meeting of the Board objected to the principle of
issuing licenses, and if it was so, so far as he understood the
matter, that Board could do nothing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account