History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
The Dutch were at first, if not throughout, by far the heavier
sufferers. Within a month of the declaration of war Blake captured
one hundred of their herring fleet, together with twelve frigates of
their convoy, sinking the thirteenth. He also made efforts to intercept
five East Indiamen under the Dutch flag, which had endeavoured to get
into port by sailing round Scotland, and he contrived to carry six
more frigates into Yarmouth Roads. About the same period Sir George
Ayscough, the admiral commanding in the Channel, having thirty-eight
ships under him, made an attempt to stop the passage of a fleet of
Dutch merchantmen, sailing under the protection of De Ruyter, another
distinguished Dutch admiral, but after a furious engagement he was
compelled to retire into Plymouth, and to leave a free passage for De
Ruyter’s convoy down Channel.
[Sidenote: The English capture prizes.]
[Sidenote: Peace of 1654.]
The English, however, again took possession of the Channel, and
scarcely a day passed without Dutch prizes being brought into English
ports: many of these having made long voyages to distant parts of
the world, were on their homeward voyage without apprehension of
war. Nor is it surprising that booty so valuable should have whetted
the appetite of the English people for war. But happily, on the 5th
of April 1654, a treaty of peace was concluded. Cromwell’s enemies
complained that in the treaty no mention was made of the sole right
of the English to the fishing on their own coast, nor of any annual
tribute to be paid by the Dutch for that privilege, which had been the
case in the reign of Charles. They were displeased also that he gave up
the right of search which Parliament had insisted upon; and, further,
that he did not limit the number of Dutch men-of-war to be thereafter
employed for the protection of their commerce. Cromwell, however,
required in the treaty an admission of the English sovereignty of the
seas, and the Dutch consented to strike their flag to the ships of
the Commonwealth.[179] We may add that this treaty made no reference
to the obnoxious Navigation Act, although this was in all probability
the actual cause of the war; as on this point neither Cromwell, the
Parliament, nor the nation felt disposed to yield in the smallest
degree.
[Sidenote: Alleged complaints against the Navigation Acts of Cromwell.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account