History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
It has been asserted that these laws at first occasioned loud
complaints, to the effect “that while our own people (the English) had
not shipping enough to import from all parts the goods they wanted,
they were, nevertheless, by the Navigation Act debarred from receiving
new supplies of merchandise from other nations, who only could, and
till then, did import them.”[180] At a later period it was said “No
doubt the people were right, the injustice was not seen at first, but
the complaints being unheeded, the wrong dropped out of sight.”[181]
No sudden revulsion, however, of a long established policy ever takes
place without deep complaints from the parties whose monopoly, real
or virtual, has been destroyed. But in this instance these alleged
complaints had doubtless their origin in the mortification felt by
foreign agents in London, whose principals abroad had for centuries
enjoyed an undue share of the shipping trade of this country.
[Sidenote: Navigation Act of Charles II.]
[Sidenote: The Maritime Charter of England.]
During the ten years which followed the passing of the Act of 1651,
the Legislature became more and more convinced of the efficacy of
these prohibitive laws, and was prepared to render them practically
even more stringent. If Charles II. could have reversed any of
Cromwell’s legislative measures with advantage or popularity, he and
his court would gladly have taken such a step. But Charles and his
ministers perceived the advantages which had already accrued from the
legislation of the preceding government, and in the first year of his
actual reign[182] passed an Act (12 Charles II.) which obtained even
from Sir Josiah Child, a liberal and enlightened merchant, the title
of ‘The Maritime Charter of England.’[183] This Act may be deemed the
complement of the Acts of 1646 and 1651, and its principles continued
in force until the year 1849, when, under a totally different state
of circumstances, they gave way to a system more liberal and better
adapted to preserve that share of the trade of the world, both as
manufacturers and carriers of merchandise, which Great Britain had
acquired on the transfer of the maritime power of the Dutch to her own
people two centuries before.
[Sidenote: Its main provisions recited.]
[Sidenote: Trade with the Dutch prohibited.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account