History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
On the death of Mr. Pitt, January the 23rd, 1806, his great political
and rival successor, Mr. Fox, endeavoured to make peace with France,
but in vain. Indeed before his own death, which took place the 13th of
September the same year, he had become satisfied that any lasting peace
with Napoleon was impossible. Having vanquished and humbled two of the
greatest powers of Europe, the ambition of the ruler of France grew
in proportion to his conquests; his arrogance being only qualified by
the reflection that he could not reach England by land, and could not
therefore crush her, as he had done so many other European states;
in fact, she had proved to be the one stumbling-block between him and
universal empire. Unable to reach her with his armies, and frustrated
in every attempt to overcome her fleets at sea, he attempted her
ruin by means which appeared at the moment more within the reach of
one who had overrun Europe with his armies. Thus, he declared to the
European Powers that he would not restore any of their territories till
England had restored the colonies she had taken during the previous
war from France and other countries. Allowing only a brief armistice
to the Prussians, and having arranged everything in his own mind,
he proclaimed the whole of their ports to be blockaded, and closed
those of Hanover against the ships of England and her manufacturers.
Defeated by this country in every action at sea, he resolved, if an
alliance with all the leading European powers could be secured, to
destroy her commerce by a gigantic but impracticable scheme, known as
his “continental system,” the one object of which was the exclusion of
British ships from every port in Europe.
[Sidenote: English Order in Council, April 8, 1806.]
Conduct so outrageous was not to be endured by even the mild government
of Mr. Fox, which, on receipt of the intelligence of the exclusion of
the English flag from the harbours of the Elbe, recalled the British
ambassador from Berlin, declared the rivers Ems, Weser, Elbe, and
Trave, and all Prussian harbours to be in a state of blockade; laid an
embargo on every ship of that nation then in British ports, and issued
an Order in Council [April 8, 1806] authorizing the seizure of all
vessels navigating under Prussian colours, so that before many weeks
had elapsed four hundred of its merchant vessels were laid up in the
harbours of Great Britain.
[Sidenote: Berlin Decree, Nov. 10;]
These stringent measures were the forerunners of Napoleon’s famous
decrees.[264] The redoubtable Berlin decree issued at that city on
the 10th of November, 1806, was meant, we must presume, to be only
applicable to the countries actually occupied by his armies, including
France, Holland, Spain, Italy, and the whole of Germany, although it
declared the British Islands to be in a state of blockade.
[Sidenote: Its terms.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account