History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
The policy of these decrees became the battle-ground of party in
England during several successive years. In fact they affected so many
powerful classes in so many different ways, that it was natural that
in a parliamentary government, not then always acting from the most
disinterested motives, a great party clamour should be created. Nor,
indeed, can it be doubted that the Berlin Decrees, and still more
the Milan and Bayonne Decrees, struck a heavy blow at the American
neutral trade; while, on the other hand, it cannot be denied that the
merchants of England carried on a profitable clandestine trade with
the continent through the intermediation of neutral ships, chiefly
American. This commerce Napoleon resolved to destroy at the hazard of
risking a war with the United States; and by the policy he pursued in
coercing the Americans to resist the English Orders in Council, he
achieved two objects: first, he discountenanced and did all he could to
suppress a trade which enriched his enemies, and secondly, he fomented
a feeling of hostility against England, whereby, as was proved in the
sequel, England found a new enemy ranged against her. The merchants
connected with America, who had employed their shipping in carrying on
a contraband trade with the continent, inveighed loudly against the
impolicy and “barbarous tyranny” of the English Orders in Council, and
asserted that these were the cause, _the original cause_, of all the
evils which ensued. Yet, in point of fact, those merchants who were
not shipowners cared little in what vessels their goods reached the
continent so long as the insurance effected secured them from loss, and
they could carry on the trade to a profit.
[Sidenote: Interests of the shipowners maintained.]
If such a system could have been allowed to prevail, it is obvious that
the shipowners of England would have been altogether shut out from
carrying on the ordinary trade of the country, and the whole business
of the transportation of commodities must have been monopolised by
neutral powers, who would reap incalculable benefit from the calamities
of the war. Napoleon, discerning clearly the usual practice of the
ports of Europe, and the enormous quantity of English goods shipped
from England and her colonies in American bottoms, at once struck
a blow at this commerce by seizing every vessel belonging to that
country then at Antwerp, Bordeaux, and Bayonne, and by burning those
in the port of St. Sebastian; nevertheless, the Americans, instead
of asserting openly and boldly the independence of their flag, as
they did in later years, secretly intrigued with Napoleon to obtain a
special immunity from his decrees for their shipping trade with England.
[Sidenote: Napoleon infringes his own decrees.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account