History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
Leaving a council to direct affairs in Paris, Napoleon left that city
to commence his last campaign, which ended in his final overthrow at
Waterloo on the 18th of June, 1815.
[Sidenote: Reflections.]
Every impartial reader of history can hardly fail to see that though
the maritime decrees of Napoleon on the one hand, and the English
Orders in Council on the other, had nothing to do with the origin
of the lamentable wars which so long shook Europe to its base, they
were the means, in a great measure, of their prolongation, and were
the origin, in an essential manner, of the war between England and
the United States of America. Attempts on the part of governments to
deprive nations of what is necessary for their existence must ever
produce the most serious consequences. Besides, it is alike vain
and presumptuous for weak man to interpose obstacles in the way of
securing to large masses of the people articles absolutely requisite
for them, and which, so far as we can divine the inscrutable ways of
Providence, are produced for the general use and welfare of mankind.
Indeed, the mind is impressed with a singular sensation on beholding a
great conqueror, just reposing after one of his most signal victories,
issuing decrees that would render almost every sea desolate, and
prevent an interchange of commodities as necessary for the daily wants
of his own people as for those of other nations.
In gaining his great victories, in adding state after state to his
dominions, and in placing brother after brother on the throne of
ancient kingdoms whose dynasties he had overthrown, Napoleon may for
some mysterious purpose have been performing the part assigned to him
by a Higher Power, and accomplishing the destinies of which, under
Heaven, he was to be the instrument. But when he extended his ambition
to the ocean, when he undertook to overwhelm the innocent peoples
of many nations by his maritime decrees, he left the orbit in which
evidently it had been his destiny to move for one on which his fleets
had been invariably defeated, and where he himself was never seen
except as a fugitive, and at last as a prisoner of war in the hands of
the ancient rival of his country.
FOOTNOTES:
[289] This Act, in its fullest stringency, meant no commercial
intercourse with any European state (see ‘Key to Orders in Council,’
No. 10).
[290] This Act passed Congress on the 1st of March, 1809; generally
it provided that the “commerce of America was opened to all the world
except France and England.” The ships of war of both countries were
excluded from American ports (‘Key to Orders in Council,’ No. 11).
[291] ‘Report of the Chamber of Deputies,’ 1835.
[292] Holmes’ ‘American Annals,’ vol. ii. pp. 441, 442.
[293] The case of the English will be found treated at great length in
Mr. Stephen’s speech, March 1809, a full verbatim report of which will
be found at the end of vol. xiii. ‘Parl. Debates’ for that year.
[294] See _ante_ for notice of the celebrated pamphlet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account