History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
When, however, the American government determined to send a special
mission to England for the adjustment of differences between the two
nations, the British habit of impressing on the high seas was stated as
the foremost of the American grievances, and their plenipotentiaries
were instructed to urge the abandonment of a practice “so disgraceful
and injurious to their country, as the point most essential to its
peace, honour, and tranquillity.”
[Sidenote: Concessions made in the colonial trade.]
[Sidenote: Blockades in the colonies, and of the French ports in the
Channel.]
As the second ground of complaint, the alleged violation of neutral
rights by seizing and condemning their merchantmen though engaged in
lawful commerce, involves a variety of important considerations, which
were incessantly the subjects of dispute, it may be desirable to state
the substance of the views of the American government and of English
jurisconsults on so important a question. England had conceded to the
Americans, in the previous war, permission to trade with the colonies
of the enemy for articles intended for their own domestic consumption;
and in case no market was found in the United States for articles
imported with that intention, she had permitted them to re-export
those articles to any part of the world not invested by her blockading
squadrons. In 1804 certain ports of Martinique and Guadaloupe, French
colonies, were declared to be in a state of blockade, and the siege of
Curaçoa was also converted into a blockade. In August of the same year
a rigorous blockade was declared to be established at the entrances
of the ports of Fécamp, St. Valery, Caux, Dieppe, Treport, the Somme,
Etaples, Boulogne, Calais, Gravelines, Dunkirk, Nieuport, and Ostend.
Bonaparte at that moment was threatening England with invasion, and
England was putting forth all her strength to repel the attempt and
to circumvent his designs. America looked calmly on, and profited,
as we have seen, by the struggle, pushing forward her pretensions
and alleged grievances with the view of annoying as much as she
could both belligerents, and especially Great Britain. England, as is
well known, had constantly refused the Americans permission to trade
directly between the colonies of the enemy and the mother-country,
but had tolerated the indirect communication above mentioned, on the
supposition that the goods so transmitted had been intended originally
for American consumption, and would not have been re-exported, but for
want of a market in the United States.
[Sidenote: The dispute concerning the trade with the French colonies.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account