History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
an iron paddle-wheel steamer, called the _Argentina_, of 100 tons for
the survey of the La Plata, which ascended the Parana beyond where
any steamer had previously navigated. In 1861 he despatched the iron
propeller _Pembroke_ for China, where she was sold. She held the only
“letter of marque” issued by the United States’ Government during the
great civil war. Such are a few of the leading points in the active
life of Mr. R. B. Forbes, of whom his country may be proud, who still
in his fresh old age continues his career of usefulness. He now builds
boats for the “good boys” of his native town, and I had great pleasure
in executing for him the other day an order for no end of miniature
blocks, dead-eyes, anchors, and cables.
[190] “We have to say that, if the _Britannia_ beats the _Washington_
over (and they both, we understand, start the same day), she will
have to run by the deep mines, and put in more coal. We shall have,
in two years’ time, a system of Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific steamers
in operation that will tell a brilliant story for the enterprise of
Brother Jonathan. We are bound to go ahead, and steam is the agent of
the age. We expect yet to see the day when a traveller will be able to
leave New York, and going eastward all the time, will be enabled to
make the circuit of the earth, coming in by Huascualco, in the summer
interval between two sessions of Congress, spending a month or two in
the Mediterranean on the way.”
[191] “The _Washington_ is stated to be of 2000 horses’ indicated
power, and is 1750 tons Government measure, or 2000 tons carpenters’
measure; so her steam power is to her tonnage as one to one, while the
_Britannia_ has only one horse-power to 2¾ tons.[193] To go a little,
however, more into detail: both vessels have two cylinders, I believe,
of the same diameter, viz., 72 inches, and both have side beam engines;
the stroke of the _Washington_ is 10 feet; her boilers are able to
carry (they say) 30 lbs. of steam; but, if we allow her only 23 lbs.
⨉ 13 vacuum, she will be still double the power of the _Britannia_
with 5 lbs. ⨉ 13 lbs. i.e., = 900 horses’ power (450 ⨉ 2). I am now
speaking of full steam, or at least both cutting off at the same point.
The _Herald_ (New York) says the _Washington’s_ wheels are 39 feet in
diameter, and 7½ feet dip; but the latter is of course an error, and
probably means 7½ feet face; she has two boilers 36 feet ⨉ 15 on the
plan; there are three furnaces, each 7 feet ⨉ 4 feet 6 inches ⨉ 6 = 189
feet. Well then, there you have data from which you may calculate how
many horses’ power can be got off that great surface with anthracite
and blowers. Her recipient heating surface must be large; she has
flues, perhaps 12 inches in diameter.”
[192] The proportion was actually one to two as against one to two and
three-quarters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account