History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
The result of this and other communications addressed by Mr. Taylor
to the Government of Bombay, was an official letter from them to
the Court of Directors stating that while they considered the Court
alone “competent to pass a decision on his proposals,” they strongly
commended the project he was endeavouring to accomplish. “We beg to
add our opinion that no doubt can exist of the practicability as well
as the utility of extending steam navigation to Egypt from Bombay;
and that we should consider it a most fortunate circumstance if our
attempts to promote this desirable object shall, by indicating such
to be the case, induce men of enterprise and capital to embark in an
undertaking of the nature proposed by Mr. Taylor.”
[Sidenote: and discussion of the question.]
“The plan proposed by Mr. Taylor,” they continued, “evidently requires
great and combined means to give it even a prospect of success; we
are of opinion that his calculations are far too sanguine and that
his plan is on too large a scale. These are, however, objections to
his scheme which may be easily obviated. In the first instance, we
must give our opinion as relates to India that the undertaking may
and should be conducted on a more limited scale, and subsequently
extended according to circumstances. In transmitting these proposals
for your consideration, we cannot avoid expressing our decided opinion
that almost incalculable advantages may be anticipated from a well
established steam communication by the Red Sea, and our earnest hope
that, unless other proposals from individuals have been entertained
and their plans put in progress, and in case Mr. Taylor’s schemes are
viewed as either inexpedient or impracticable, that every support
will be afforded by your Honourable Court to maintain this desirable
communication by vessels in the public service.”[308]
[Sidenote: Supineness of Court of Directors.]
But the temper of the Court of Directors was still strikingly in
contrast with the earnestness of the Bombay Government. They do not
seem to have cared much about the development of the commercial
resources of their empire, and so the recommendations of the Governor
and Council at Bombay were laid aside for future consideration; indeed,
it was not until, after nearly two years, that they even acknowledged
the letters they had received. The expense, they averred, exceeded the
amount they cared to risk; while, in the proposed undertaking, they
had evidently little confidence, as they urged that “the loss from
defective vessels and engines is as likely to occur as ever.” They,
nevertheless, at last affirmed that they were not insensible to the
advantages of rapid communication with India nor of the importance of
steam for that purpose.
[Sidenote: Their views.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account