History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 4 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
“We are also disposed to believe,” they added, “that a steam
communication by the Red Sea, and still more, if it should be found
practicable, by the Persian Gulf and the River Euphrates, would open
the way to other improvements, and would ultimately redound to the
benefit of this country as well as of India; and, if our finances were
in a flourishing state (they were always poor, though ever rolling in
wealth), we might probably feel it a duty to incur even the enormous
outlay which we have specified (100,000_l._). In the present condition
of our resources, we cannot, however, think the probable difference of
time in the mere transmission of letters a sufficient justification
for the expense. We cannot anticipate that the return in postage and
passengers would pay more than a very small portion of the charge.” But
happily, after other observations, they concluded by saying that, “at
the same time we deem the subject too important to be lost sight of or
hastily dismissed.”[309]
[Sidenote: Official report of the first voyages of the _Hugh Lindsay_,
1830.]
In the meantime the _Hugh Lindsay_ (a war steam-vessel, built of teak
at Bombay in 1829 for the service of the East India Company), had
fortunately been despatched[310] by the Bombay Government under command
of Captain J. H. Wilson, from Bombay to Suez and back—a voyage, I may
add, which was twice repeated before the Court of Directors gave any
instructions on the subject, though one, too, materially tending to
solve some at least of the difficulties they had contemplated. It was
on the second of these occasions that Sir John Malcolm and his suite
made the overland passage to England.
“When it was determined,” remarks Captain Wilson, “that the _Hugh
Lindsay_ should attempt the voyage to Suez, it became necessary to
put on board double the quantity of coal the vessel was built to
carry, to do which, a great part of the space originally intended for
accommodation was appropriated to the stowage of coal; water also
was necessary, sufficient for use until the vessel should reach land
in the event of a break-down between Bombay and the first depôt; as
also stores and provisions for the whole voyage to and from the Red
Sea.”[311]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account