[222] ‘Figliuoli porse del suo fratello Cuitlahuatzin.’ _Clavigero_, _Storia Mess._, iii. 30. [223] ‘Ciertas pieças de oro y plata bien labradas, y vn casquete de oro menudo.... Peso todo esto dos mil, y nouenta Castellanos.’ _Gomara_, _Hist. Mex._, 58. [224] Before the embassy came, says Herrera, ‘Diò orden con voluntad del señor de Chianhuitzlan, que los tres Mexicanos pressos fuessen sueltos,’ dec. ii. lib. v. cap. xi. [225] _Ixtlilxochitl_, _Hist. Chich._, 290. Other authorities differ in the spelling. [226] One of them who had bartered a fine light-colored horse for some property in Cuba was unable to annul the trade, and thus lost his animal. _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Verdad._, 34. Gomara, _Hist. Mex._, 64, refers merely to murmurs in favor of Velazquez, which Cortés quiets by placing a few in chains for a time. [227] ‘Muriò este soldado en vna guerra en la Prouincia de Guatimala sobre vn Peñol.’ _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Verdad._, 35. He places the incident on the return march. [228] According to Gomara the Aztec garrison does ravage the country when the Totonac revolt occurs, and their forces meet the Spaniards on the field, only to flee at the sight of the horsemen. Cortés and four others dismount, and mingling with the fleeing, reach the fort gates, which they hold till their troops come up. Surrendering the place to the allies, Cortés tells them to respect the people and to let the garrison depart without arms or banner. This victory gained great influence for the Spaniards, and remembering the feat of Cortés, the Indians declared that one Spaniard was enough to aid them in achieving victory. _Hist. Mex._, 59. Ixtlilxochitl, who follows Gomara, fights the Aztec garrison as far as the city, and then captures it. _Hist. Chich._, 290. Solis assumes that a few Spaniards cut off the retreat of the townsmen, and rushing forward with some Cempoalans, are already inside when the leaders come to plead for mercy. _Hist. Mex._, i. 197-8. The foremost credit is however due to Bernal Diaz, _Hist. Verdad._, 34-5, who, being present, declares Gomara’s account wholly wrong, that no garrison existed here, and that no resistance was made. The latter sentence is modified by Tapia, also a member of the expedition, who states that the town did resist and was punished. _Relacion_, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. Doc._, ii. 566. Hence it may be assumed that Diaz, as a foot soldier, was not present to see the probably bloodless rout of the Indians by the cavalry. The townsmen are not likely to have allowed the Cempoalans to approach without offering resistance, or, in case they knew of the Spanish advance, without sending a deputation before the pillage began.