History of Mexico, Volume 1, 1516-1521Bancroft, Hubert Howe
History
History of Mexico, Volume 1, 1516-1521
Bancroft, Hubert Howe
Mexico -- History
[243] Bernal Diaz, _Hist. Verdad._, 37, gives a long detail
of its contents, particularly of the conclusion, wherein
the bishop of Búrgos is pointed out as favoring his friends
and relations in the distribution of Indian governments.
Velazquez enjoyed his special favor in return for the large
presents in gold and towns he had made, to the prejudice
of the crown. Cortés, on reading the letter, was highly
pleased with the eulogy bestowed upon himself, and promised
to remember it when rewards came to be distributed, but
he objected to the prominence given to the discoveries
of Córdoba and Grijalva, ‘sino á èl solo se atribuia el
descubrimiento, y la honra, ê honor de todo,’ and wished to
suppress the statement that one fifth of the profits were
to be given to him. The men declined to hide anything from
the king, and so Cortés no doubt made the messengers hide
the letter. Tapia gives a brief synopsis of it, mentioning
the objections raised against the bishop of Búrgos, and
the resolution not to obey any orders contrary to their
report till the king had replied to it—‘é para que otra
cosa en contrario de lo que le escrebiamos no se hiciese,
que S. M. sin saber de qué hacia mercedes, no las hiciese,
estábamos prestos de morir é tener la tierra en su real
nombre fasta ver respuesta de esta carta.’ _Relacion_, in
_Icazbalceta_, _Col. Doc._, ii. 566. ‘Esta carta no vido
el Emperador, porque, si la viera, no les sucederia ni á
Cortés ni á sus consortes el negocio tan favorable como
abajo se parecerá.’ _Las Casas_, _Hist. Ind._, iv. 498.
[244] ‘En una nao que ... despaché á 16 de julio del año
de 1519, envié a V. A. muy larga y particular relacion.’
_Cortés_, _Cartas_, 51; _Oviedo_, iii. 261. ‘En veinte y
seis dias del mes de Julio ... partieron de San Juan de
Ulua.’ _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Verdad._, 37. On the next
page he says July 6th. The naming of Ulua as the port of
departure shows also a carelessness of facts; yet Gomara
says:‘Partieron ... de Aquiahuiztlã ... a veinte y seis.’
_Hist. Mex._, 6. Still Cortés’ letter, written so soon
after, ought to be correct. Prescott accepts the 26th.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account