History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age. Vol. IDunlop, John Colin
History
History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age. Vol. I
Dunlop, John Colin
Latin literature -- History and criticism
49 Bentley, however, is of opinion that the College of Augurs, whose
divination was made from observations of birds, was of Roman
institution, being founded by Numa, and that the skill and province
of the Haruspices of Etruria reached to three things, _exta,
fulgura, et ostenta_, entrails of cattle, thunders, and monstrous
births, but did not include auguries from the flight of birds. “It
often happened,” he adds, “that this pack of Etruscan soothsayers
gave their answers quite cross to what the Roman augurs had given,
so that the two disciplines clashed.”—(_Remarks on a late Discourse
of Freethinking_, p. 241, Lond. 1737.)
50 Valerius Maximus, Lib. I. c. i. Ed. 1533. Cicero, _De Divinatione_,
Lib. I. c. 41. Ed. Schütz.
_ 51 Origin, &c. of Language_. Part I. book iii. c. 11.
_ 52 Diversions of Purley_. Part II. c. iv. Wakefield and Horne Tooke
had undertaken in conjunction a division and separation of the Latin
language into two parts, placing together, in one division, all that
could be clearly shewn to be Greek, and in the other, all that could
be clearly shewn to be of northern extraction, including, I presume,
both Teutonic and Celtic originals. This design, we are informed,
was frustrated “by the persecution of that virtuous and harmless
good man, Mr Gilbert Wakefield.”—_Divers. Purley_, II. 4. See also
on the origin of the Latin Language, Ginguené, _Hist. Littéraire
d’Italie_, Tom. I.
_ 53 De Novi Instrumenti Stylo_, c. 1. London, 1648.
_ 54 De Lingua Latina_, lib. IV. c. 10.
55 Remondini, _Dissertaz. sopra una iscrizione Osca_, p. 49. ed. 1760,
Genoa. Some writers have even asserted, that the Twelve tables were
originally written in the Oscan dialect. Terrasson, _Hist. de la
Jurisprudence Romaine_. Baron de Theis, _Voyage de Polyclete_, let.
15.
56 It would be foreign to the object of this work to enter into the
inquiry, whether the Etruscan arts were the result of indigenous
taste and cultivation, or were derived from the Greeks. The latter
proposition has been maintained by Winckelman and Lanzi—the former
by Tiraboschi and Pignotti. (_Storia di Toscana_, T. 1. Ed. Pisa,
1815.)
57 Forsyth’s _Remarks on Italy_, p. 141.
58 “La grandeur de Rome,” says Montesquieu, “parût bientòt dans ses
edifices publics. Les ouvrages qui ont donné, et qui donnent encore
aujourd’hui la plus haute idée de sa puissance ont été faits sous
les Rois. On commençoit déjà a batir la Ville eternelle.” _Grandeur
et Decadence des Romains_, c. 1.
59 Dempster, _Etruria Regalis_, Lib. III. c. 80.
60 Horat. _Epist._ Lib. II. Ep. 1.
61 Ennius, _Annal._
_ 62 De Die Natali_, c. 5.
_ 63 Saggio di Ling. Etrusc._ Tom. II. p. 567.
_ 64 De Ling. Lat._ Lib. IV. c. 9.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account