History of Spanish Literature, vol. 2 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 2 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
All these, and many more like them, were represented with the consent
of the ecclesiastical powers,--sometimes even in convents and other
religious houses, but oftener in public, and always under auspices
no less obviously religious.[382] The favorite materials for such
dramas, however, were found, at last, almost exclusively in the lives
of popular saints; and the number of plays filled with such histories
and miracles was so great, soon after the year 1600, that they came to
be considered as a class by themselves, under the name of “Comedias
de Santos,” or Saints’ Plays. Lope wrote many of them. Besides those
already mentioned, we have from his pen dramatic compositions on the
lives of Saint Francis, San Pedro de Nolasco, Saint Thomas Aquinas,
Saint Julian, Saint Nicholas of Tolentino, Santa Teresa, three on
San Isidro de Madrid, and not a few others. Many of them, like Saint
Nicholas of Tolentino,[383] are very strange and extravagant; but
perhaps none will give a more true idea of the entire class than the
first one he wrote, on the subject of the favored saint of his own
city, San Isidro de Madrid.[384]
[382] C. Pellicer, Orígen, Tom. I. p. 153.
[383] “San Nicolas de Tolentino,” Comedias, Tom. XXIV., Zaragoza,
1641, ff. 167, etc. Each act, as is not uncommon in the old
Spanish theatre, is a sort of separate play, with its separate
list of personages prefixed. The first has twenty-one; among
which are God, the Madonna, History, Mercy, Justice, Satan, etc.
It opens with a masquerading scene in a public square, of no
little spirit; immediately after which we have a scene in heaven,
containing the Divine judgment on the soul of one who had died
in mortal sin; then another spirited scene, in a public square,
among loungers, with a sermon from a fervent, fanatical monk;
and afterwards, successive scenes between Nicholas, who has
been moved by this sermon to enter a convent, and his family,
who consent to his purpose with reluctance; the whole ending
with a dialogue of the rudest humor between Nicholas’s servant,
who is the buffoon of the piece, and a servant-maid, to whom he
was engaged to be married, but whom he now abandons, determined
to follow his master into a religious seclusion, which, at the
same time, he is making ridiculous by his jests and parodies.
This is the first act. The other two acts are such as might be
anticipated from it.
[384] This is not either of the plays ordered by the city of
Madrid, to be acted in the open air in 1622, in honor of the
canonization of San Isidro, and found in the twelfth volume of
Lope’s Obras Sueltas; though, on a comparison with these last, it
will be seen that it was used in their composition. It, in fact,
was printed five years earlier, in the seventh volume of Lope’s
Comedias, Madrid, 1617, and continued long in favor, for it is
reprinted in Parte XXVIII. of “Comedias Escogidas de los Mejores
Ingenios,” Madrid, 1667, 4to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account