History of Spanish Literature, vol. 2 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 2 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
But finding the disease deeply fixed in the national taste, and
models of a purer style of poetry wanting to resist it, he printed,
in 1631,--the same year in which, for the same purpose, he published
a collection of the poetry of Luis de Leon,--a small volume which he
announced as “Poems by the Bachiller Francisco de la Torre,”--a person
of whom he professed, in his Preface, to know nothing, except that he
had accidentally found his manuscripts in the hands of a bookseller,
with the Approbation of Alonso de Ercilla attached to them; and that
he supposed him to be the ancient Spanish poet referred to by Boscan
nearly a hundred years before. But this little volume is a work of no
small consequence. It contains sonnets, odes, _canciones_, elegies, and
eclogues; many of them written with antique grace and simplicity, and
all in a style of thought easy and natural, and in a versification of
great exactness and harmony. It is, in short, one of the best volumes
of miscellaneous poems in the Spanish language.[479]
[479] Perhaps there is a little too much of the imitation of
Petrarch and of the Italians in the Poems of the Bachiller de la
Torre; but they are, I think, not only graceful and beautiful,
but generally full of the national tone, and of a tender spirit,
connected with a sincere love of nature and natural scenery. I
would instance the ode, “Alexis que contraria,” in the edition of
Velazquez (p. 17), and the truly Horatian ode (p. 44) beginning,
“O tres y quatro veces venturosa,” with the description of
the dawn of day, and the sonnet to Spring (p. 12). The first
eclogue, too, and all the _endechas_, which are in the most
flowing Adonian verse, should not be overlooked. Sometimes he has
unrhymed lyrics, in the ancient measures, not always successful,
but seldom without beauty.
No suspicion seems to have been whispered, either at the moment of
their first publication, or for a long time afterwards, that these
poems were the productions of any other than the unknown personage
whose name appeared on their title-page. In 1753, however, a second
edition of them was published by Velazquez, the author of the
“Essay on Spanish Poetry,” claiming them to be entirely the work of
Quevedo;[480]--a claim which has been frequently noticed since, some
admitting and some denying it, but none, in any instance, fairly
discussing the grounds on which it is placed by Velazquez, or settling
their validity.[481]
[480] “Poesías que publicó D. Francisco de Quevedo Villegas,
Cavallero del Órden de Santiago, Señor de la Torre de Juan Abad,
con el nombre del Bachiller Francisco de la Torre. Añadese en
esta segunda edicion un Discurso, en que se descubre ser el
verdadero autor el mismo D. Francisco de Quevedo, por D. Luis
Joseph Velazquez,” etc. Madrid, 1753, 4to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account