History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
[8] A striking instance of this is to be found in the “Primera
Parle del Parnaso Antártico,” by Diego Mexia, printed at
Seville, 1608, 4to, and the only portion of it ever printed.
It consists of an original poetical letter by a lady to Mexia,
and a translation of twenty-one of the Epistles of Ovid and his
“Ibis”; all in _terza rima_, and nearly all in pure and beautiful
Castilian verse. In the edition in the collection of Fernandez,
Tom. XIX., 1799, the epistle by the lady is omitted, which is a
pity, since it contains notices of several South American poets.
Rioja, on the contrary, seems to have been of the true temperament,
and to have written elegies from instinct, though he called them
_Silvas_; while Quevedo, if he were the author of the poems that pass
under the name of the Bachiller de la Torre, must have done violence
to his genius in the composition of ten short pieces, which he calls
_Endechas_, in Adonian verse, but which read much like imitations of
some of the gentler among the old ballads. If to these we add the
thirteen elegies of Villegas, nearly all of which are epistles, and
one or two of them light and amusing epistles, we shall have what is
most worthy of notice in this small division of Spanish poetry during
the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, that has not been already
considered. From the whole, we should naturally infer that the Spanish
temperament was little fitted to the subdued, simple, and gentle
tone of the proper elegy; a conclusion that is undoubtedly true,
notwithstanding the examples of Garcilasso and Rioja, the best and most
elegiac portions of whose poetry do not even bear its name.[9]
[9] The best elegiac poetry in the Spanish language is, perhaps,
that in the two divisions of the first eclogue of Garcilasso.
Elegies, or mournful poems of any kind, are often called
_Endechas_ in Spanish, as Quevedo called his sad amatory poems;
but the origin of the word is not settled, nor its meaning quite
well defined. Venegas, in a vocabulary of obscure words at the
end of his “Agonía del Tránsito de la Muerte,” 1574, p. 370, says
he thinks it comes from _inde jaces_, as if the mourner addressed
the dead body. But this is absurd. It may come from the Greek
ἕνδεκα, for when the last verse of each stanza contained just
eleven syllables, the poem was said to be written in _endechas
reales_. See Covarrubias, and the Academy, _ad verbum_, who give
no opinion.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account