History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
But a love of the country, of country scenery and country occupations,
pervades nearly every thing Saa de Miranda wrote. The very animals
seem to be treated by him with more naturalness and familiarity than
they are elsewhere; and throughout the whole of his poetry, there is
an ease and amenity that show it comes from the heart. Why he wrote
so much in Spanish, it is not now easy to tell. Perhaps he thought
the language more poetical than his native Portuguese, or perhaps he
had merely personal reasons for his preference. But whatever may have
been the cause, six out of his eight eclogues are composed in natural,
flowing Castilian; and the result of the whole is, that, while, on all
accounts, he is placed among the four or five principal poets of his
own country, he occupies a position of enviable distinction among those
of the prouder nation that soon became, for a time, its masters.[10]
[10] There are many editions of the Works of Saa de Miranda; but
the second and best (s. l. 1614, 4to) is preceded by a life of
him, which claims to have been composed by his personal friends,
and which states the odd fact, that the lady of whom he was
enamoured was so ugly, that her family declined the match until
he had well considered the matter; but that he persevered, and
became so fondly attached to her, that he died, at last, from
grief at her loss. His merits as a poet are well discussed by
Ant. das Neves Pereira, in the fifth volume of the “Memorias
de Litt. Portugueza” of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Lisboa,
1793, pp. 99, etc. Some of his works are in the Spanish Index
Expurgatorius, 1667, p. 72.
Montemayor, Polo, and their followers in prose pastorals, scattered
bucolic verse of all kinds freely through their fictions; and
sometimes, though seldom, they added to the interest and merit of their
stories by this sort of ornament. One of those who had least success
in it was Cervantes; and of those who had most, Balbuena stands in
the first rank. His “Golden Age” contains some of the best and most
original eclogues in the language; written, indeed, rather in the free,
rustic tone of Theocritus, than with the careful finish of Virgil, but
not on that account the less attractive.[11]
[11] Of the poets whose eclogues are found in their prose
pastorals I shall speak at large when I examine this division of
Spanish romantic fiction. Montemayor, however, it should be noted
here, wrote other eclogues, which are in his Cancionero, 1588,
ff. 111, etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account