History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 2/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 2/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
[44] Ibid., cap. 36.--Cortés, in his Second Letter to the Emperor
Charles V., estimates the number of fighting-men at 50,000. Relacion
segunda, ap. Lorenzana, p. 40.
[45] Las Casas, Hist. de las Indias, MS., lib. 3, cap.
121.--Ixtlilxochitl, Hist. Chich., MS., cap. 81.--Oviedo, Hist. de las
Indias, MS., lib. 33, cap. 1.
[46] The historian, with the aid of Clavigero, himself a Mexican, may
rectify frequent blunders of former writers, in the orthography of
Aztec names. Both Robertson and Solís spell the name of this place
_Quiabislan_. Blunders in such a barbarous nomenclature must be
admitted to be very pardonable.
[47] “Grande artífice,” exclaims Solís, “de medir lo que disponia con
lo que recelaba; y prudente capitan él que sabe caminar en alcance de
las contingencias”! Conquista, lib. 2, cap. 9.
[48] Ixtlilxochitl, Hist. Chich., MS., cap. 81.--Rel. Seg. de Cortés,
ap. Lorenzana, p. 40.--Gomara, Crónica, cap. 34-36, ap. Barcia, tom.
ii.--Bernal Diaz, Conquista, cap. 46, 47.--Herrera, Hist. general, dec.
2, lib. 5, cap. 10, 11.
[49] Carta de Vera Cruz, MS.--Bernal Diaz, Conquista, cap. 48.--Oviedo,
Hist. de las Ind., MS., lib. 33, cap. 1.--Declaracion de Montejo,
MS.--Notwithstanding the advantages of its situation, La Villa Rica
was abandoned in a few years for a neighboring position to the south,
not far from the mouth of the Antigua. This second settlement was
known by the name of _Vera Cruz Vieja_, “Old Vera Cruz.” Early in
the seventeenth century this place, also, was abandoned for the
present city, _Nueva Vera Cruz_, or New Vera Cruz, as it is called.
(See _ante_, chap. 5, note 8.) Of the true cause of these successive
migrations we are ignorant. If, as is pretended, it was on account
of the _vómito_, the inhabitants, one would suppose, can have gained
little by the exchange. (See Humboldt, Essai politique, tom. ii. p.
210.) A want of attention to these changes has led to much confusion
and inaccuracy in the ancient maps. Lorenzana has not escaped them in
his chart and topographical account of the route of Cortés.
[50] “Teniendo respeto á que tiene por cierto, que somos los que sus
antepassados les auian dicho, que auian de venir á sus tierras, é que
deuemos de ser de sus linajes.” Bernal Diaz, Hist. de la Conquista,
cap. 48.
[51] Gomara, Crónica, cap. 37.--Ixtlilxochitl, Hist. Chich., MS., cap.
82.
[52] “De buena gana recibirian las Doncellas como fuesen Christianas;
porque de otra manera, no era permitido á hombres, hijos de la Iglesia
de Dios, tener comercio con idólatras.” Herrera, Hist. general, dec. 2,
lib. 5, cap. 13.
[53] Herrera, Hist. general, dec. 2, lib. 5, cap. 13.--Las Casas, Hist.
de las Indias, MS., lib. 3, cap. 122.--Herrera has put a very edifying
harangue, on this occasion, into the mouth of Cortés, which savors much
more of the priest than the soldier. Does he not confound him with
Father Olmedo?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account