History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
The general at this place was informed, by one of the Indian converts in
his train, that a conspiracy had been set on foot by Guatemozin, with
the cacique of Tacuba, and some other of the principal Indian nobles, to
massacre the Spaniards. They would seize the moment when the army should
be entangled in the passage of some defile, or some frightful morass
like that from which it had just escaped, where, taken at disadvantage,
it could be easily overpowered by the superior number of the Mexicans.
After the slaughter of the troops, the Indians would continue their
march to Honduras and cut off the Spanish settlements there. Their
success would lead to a rising in the capital, and, indeed, throughout
the land, until every Spaniard should be exterminated, and the vessels
in the ports be seized, and secured from carrying the tidings across the
waters.
No sooner had Cortés learned the particulars of this formidable plot
than he arrested Guatemozin and the principal Aztec lords in his train.
The latter admitted the fact of the conspiracy, but alleged that it had
been planned by Guatemozin and that they had refused to come into it.
Guatemozin and the chief of Tacuba neither admitted nor denied the truth
of the accusation, but maintained a dogged silence. Such is the
statement of Cortés.[208] Bernal Diaz, however, who was present in the
expedition, assures us that both Guatemozin and the cacique of Tacuba
declared their innocence. They had indeed, they said, talked more than
once together of the sufferings they were then enduring, and had said
that death was preferable to seeing so many of their poor followers
dying daily around them. They admitted, also, that a project for rising
on the Spaniards had been discussed by some of the Aztecs; but
Guatemozin had discouraged it from the first, and no scheme of the kind
could have been put into execution without his knowledge and
consent.[209] These protestations did not avail the unfortunate princes;
and Cortés, having satisfied, or affected to satisfy, himself of their
guilt, ordered them to immediate execution.
When brought to the fatal tree, Guatemozin displayed the intrepid spirit
worthy of his better days. “I knew what it was,” said he, “to trust to
your false promises, Malinche; I knew that you had destined me to this
fate, since I did not fall by my own hand when you entered my city of
Tenochtitlan. Why do you slay me so unjustly? God will demand it of
you!”[210] The cacique of Tacuba, protesting his innocence, declared
that he desired no better lot than to die by the side of his lord. The
unfortunate princes, with one or more inferior nobles (for the number is
uncertain), were then executed by being hung from the huge branches of a
_ceiba_-tree which overshadowed the road.[211]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account