History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
Such was the sad end of Guatemozin, the last emperor of the Aztecs, if
we might not rather call him “the last of the Aztecs;” since from this
time, broken in spirit and without a head, the remnant of the nation
resigned itself, almost without a struggle, to the stern yoke of its
oppressors. Among all the names of barbarian princes, there are few
entitled to a higher place on the roll of fame than that of Guatemozin.
He was young, and his public career was not long; but it was glorious.
He was called to the throne in the convulsed and expiring hours of the
monarchy, when the banded nations of Anahuac and the fierce European
were thundering at the gates of the capital. It was a post of tremendous
responsibility; but Guatemozin’s conduct fully justified the choice of
him to fill it. No one can refuse his admiration to the intrepid spirit
which could prolong a defence of his city while one stone was left upon
another; and our sympathies, for the time, are inevitably thrown more
into the scale of the rude chieftain, thus battling for his country’s
freedom, than into that of his civilized and successful antagonist.[212]
In reviewing the circumstances of Guatemozin’s death, one cannot attach
much weight to the charge of conspiracy brought against him. That the
Indians, brooding over their wrongs and present sufferings, should have
sometimes talked of revenge, would not be surprising. But that any
chimerical scheme of an insurrection, like that above mentioned, should
have been set on foot, or even sanctioned, by Guatemozin, is altogether
improbable. That prince’s explanation of the affair, as given by Diaz,
is, to say the least, quite as deserving of credit as the accusation of
the Indian informer.[213] The defect of testimony and the distance of
time make it difficult for us, at the present day, to decide the
question. We have a surer criterion of the truth in the opinion of those
who were eye-witnesses of the transaction. It is given in the words of
the old chronicler so often quoted. “The execution of Guatemozin,” says
Diaz, “was most unjust, and was thought wrong by all of us.”[214]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account