History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
During this interval the great question in respect to Cortés and the
colony had been brought to a decisive issue. The general must have
succumbed under the insidious and implacable attacks of his enemies, but
for the sturdy opposition of a few powerful friends zealously devoted to
his interests. Among them may be mentioned his own father, Don Martin
Cortés, a discreet and efficient person,[150] and the duke de Bejar, a
powerful nobleman, who from an early period had warmly espoused the
cause of Cortés. By their representations the timid regent was at length
convinced that the measures of Fonseca were prejudicial to the
interests of the crown, and an order was issued interdicting him from
further interference in any matters in which Cortés was concerned.
While the exasperated prelate was chafing under this affront, both the
commissioners Tápia and Narvaez arrived in Castile. The latter had been
ordered to Cojohuacan after the surrender of the capital, where his
cringing demeanor formed a striking contrast to the swaggering port
which he had assumed on first entering the country. When brought into
the presence of Cortés, he knelt down, and would have kissed his hand,
but the latter raised him from the ground, and, during his residence in
his quarters, treated him with every mark of respect. The general soon
afterwards permitted his unfortunate rival to return to Spain, where he
proved, as might have been anticipated, a most bitter and implacable
enemy.[151]
These two personages, reinforced by the discontented prelate, brought
forward their several charges against Cortés with all the acrimony which
mortified vanity and the thirst of vengeance could inspire. Adrian was
no longer in Spain, having been called to the chair of St. Peter; but
Charles the Fifth, after his long absence, had returned to his
dominions, in July, 1522. The royal ear was instantly assailed with
accusations of Cortés on the one hand and his vindication on the other,
till the young monarch, perplexed, and unable to decide on the merits of
the question, referred the whole subject to the decision of a board
selected for the purpose. It was drawn partly from the members of his
privy council, and partly from the Indian department, with the Grand
Chancellor of Naples as its president, and constituted altogether a
tribunal of the highest respectability for integrity and wisdom.[152]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account