History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
By this learned body a patient and temperate hearing was given to the
parties. The enemies of Cortés accused him of having seized and finally
destroyed the fleet intrusted to him by Velasquez and fitted out at the
governor’s expense; of having afterwards usurped powers in contempt of
the royal prerogative; of the unjustifiable treatment of Narvaez and
Tápia, when they had been lawfully commissioned to supersede him; of
cruelty to the natives, and especially to Guatemozin; of embezzling the
royal treasures, and remitting but a small part of its dues to the
crown; of squandering the revenues of the conquered countries in useless
and wasteful schemes, and particularly in rebuilding the capital on a
plan of unprecedented extravagance; of pursuing, in short, a system of
violence and extortion, without respect to the public interest or any
other end than his own selfish aggrandizement.
In answer to these grave charges, the friends of Cortés adduced evidence
to show that he had defrayed with his own funds two-thirds of the cost
of the expedition. The powers of Velasquez extended only to traffic,
not to establish a colony. Yet the interest of the crown required the
latter. The army had therefore necessarily assumed this power to
themselves; but, having done so, they had sent intelligence of their
proceedings to the emperor and solicited his confirmation of them. The
rupture with Narvaez was that commander’s own fault; since Cortés would
have met him amicably, had not the violent measures of his rival,
threatening the ruin of the expedition, compelled him to an opposite
course. The treatment of Tápia was vindicated on the grounds alleged to
that officer by the municipality at Cempoalla. The violence to
Guatemozin was laid at the door of Alderete, the royal treasurer, who
had instigated the soldiers to demand it. The remittances to the crown,
it was clearly proved, so far from falling short of the legitimate
fifth, had considerably exceeded it. If the general had expended the
revenues of the country on costly enterprises and public works, it was
for the interest of the country that he did so, and he had incurred a
heavy debt by straining his own credit to the utmost for the same great
objects. Neither did they deny that, in the same spirit, he was now
rebuilding Mexico on a scale suited to the metropolis of a vast and
opulent empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account