History of the FranksGregory, Bishop of Tours, Saint
History
History of the Franks
Gregory, Bishop of Tours, Saint
France -- Church history -- To 987; France -- History -- To 987; Franks -- History -- To 768
This system of superstition was not calculated to nourish delicate
moral sensibilities. Life had gone too far back to the primitive.
The word applied to the adept in this religion was _sanctus_, and it
indicated not moral excellence at all but a purely mystic quality.
The “virtue” which this person possessed was mystic potency, which
was not moral but a supernatural force. The orthodox of course called
the saint good, but this was merely because they were on the same
side, just as Cicero for example six centuries before called the
members of his political party the _boni_. Gregory’s moral praise
or blame is distributed in the same way. When he praises a man we
must look for the service done by this man to the church, and when
he blames one we must look in like manner for the opposite. Outside
of the interests of the orthodox group Gregory is not morally
thin-skinned; he shared in the brutality of his contemporaries, as
we can see in many recitals. His portrait of Clovis throws no false
light back on Gregory. Clovis was a champion and favorite of the
right supernatural powers in their fight with the wrong ones, and
any occasional atrocities he committed in the struggle were not only
pardonable but praiseworthy.[25]
* * * * *
Secular activities and the state of mind just indicated could not
coexist in the same society. We have noticed already how education
was desecularized. It is of interest to note also what had happened
to the secular professions of medicine and law.
The profession of medicine had almost completely disappeared. It
is true indeed that we hear of a few physicians. For example when
Austrechild, king Gunthram’s wife, was dying, she accused her two
physicians of having given her “potions” that were proving fatal,
and asked the king to take an oath to have them executed. He did
so and kept his word and Gregory remarks with what seems excessive
moderation, “Many wise men think that this was not done without
sin.”[26] Again we hear of Gregory’s own illness, when he sent for
a physician. He soon decided that “secular means could not help the
perishing,” and sent for some dust from St. Martin’s tomb which he
put in water and drank, and was soon cured.[27] Such tales indicate
the status of the medical profession.
The truth was that the condition of the people’s minds made the
profession an impossibility. Disease was looked upon as supernatural.
The sick man thought he had a better chance if he called the priest
rather than the doctor. Gregory tells us of Vulfilaic, who was
suddenly covered from head to foot with angry pimples; he rubbed
himself with oil consecrated at St. Martin’s tomb, and they speedily
disappeared. He reasoned that if they had been driven away by St.
Martin, they had plainly been sent by the devil.[28] This meant to
him that the whole thing was supernatural and that the true mystic
power had driven out the false which had caused the trouble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account