History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
This man had nine children, some in infancy, and all under age, whom he
left in the wide world unprotected, to enter the Society. And the angels
and saints ought to praise God for this! Alas for the moral blindness
of perverted human nature! Loyola again wrote to him, saying that he
accepted him as his brother, but that, before he could be admitted into
the noviciate, he must settle all his temporal affairs, and have nothing
more to do with the world; meanwhile, until he was ready to enter the
Society, to _keep his intention a secret_. Borgia was admitted into the
house of probation in 1548, and from that moment he became a bigoted
fanatic, whose greatest happiness consisted in lacerating his body.
Macaulay says, in an article in the _Edinburgh Review_, “that it is
making penitence with him to listen to the recital of his flagellations
and his self-inflicted punishments of all kinds.” He had so destroyed his
constitution by this absurd way of trying to please God, that he never
had a single day of good health, and was even once threatened with a
gangrene over his whole body. Such was the man appointed Vicar-General,
and afterwards chief of the order. He had no wish for the honour,
considered the office a _burden_, and we believe he was sincere in his
humility. The first battle he had to fight was against the Holy See
itself. Almost contemporaneously with his nomination, a Dominican friar
ascended the Papal throne, under the name of Pius V. A more bigoted,
fanatical, cruel, and sanguinary man never existed. Brought up under
the wing of the Inquisition, he contracted a sort of blind passion for
that bloody tribunal, and never felt so happy as when he heard of some
barbarous cruelties inflicted upon the heretics, or when some hecatombs
of these accursed enemies of Popery were sacrificed at the altar of his
revenge, or when some new instrument of torture was invented against
them. Suffice it to say, that when he sent his general, Santafiore,
to fight against the French Protestants, he commanded him in the most
peremptory manner to take no Huguenot prisoner, but to put them one and
all to the sword; and because Santafiore had not rigorously executed his
commands, he reproached him in the most bitter manner. And when that
monster of cruelty, the Duke of Alva, had spread death and desolation
over the entire of the Netherlands, 18,000 of the inhabitants of which
he boasted of having delivered up into the hands of the executioners, so
pleased was Pius with his deeds, that he sent him the consecrated hat and
sword, as marks of his approval.[126] Can this, then, be the religion
of Christ? Is it for a moment possible that this should be the true
religion, this which erects upon its altars the statues of such monsters
of iniquity, and impiously calls them saints, to be worshipped in place
of God the Lord? And among the greatest of these modern saintships
stands forth the name of Pius V.! This Pope, a most rigorous observer
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account