History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
This statement, literally taken, does not stand examination, and
Crétineau, who reports it, triumphantly exclaims, that this manner of
writing history renders all discussion impossible.[287] No, certainly
not; such infernal projects as to drive the king to extremities, and
make the king’s head fall for the fulfilment of their designs, if
formed, were neither publicly nor secretly discussed at the Court of
Rome in the presence of eighteen Jesuits and a lord, and much less was
the conclusion they came to, and their approval of the project, put in
writing and _freely distributed_: we readily acquit them of such foolish
contrivances. But, knowing as we do the arts of the Loyolan brotherhood,
we repeat that we firmly believe that it is more than probable that the
Jesuits did mix among the Roundheads and excite their fanaticism to
frenzy. I have recorded (page 171) an almost similar fact which appeared
under our own eyes in Rome. And I must further add, that all the more
virulent men who, in the beginning of Pius IX.’s reign, were proposing
the most daring and extravagant measures, were afterwards discovered to
be either in the pay of the fathers, or to be the unconscious tools of
their secret agency.
Discouraged a little under Cromwell, the Jesuits took heart again after
the restoration of Charles II., and resorted to their usual arts and
machinations. If we are to believe what they boast of, it seems that
they had plunged into a more dangerous and extensive conspiracy against
the Protestant religion and the English liberties than we are aware of.
“A secret treaty,” says Crétineau, “had been signed between Louis XIV.
and Charles II., to re-establish the Catholic religion in Great Britain.
Fathers Annat and Ferrier, successively confessors to the French king,
and the English Jesuits, had not been strangers to this negotiation;
Colman did not ignore those details, and he spoke of them in his letters
to Father Lachaise.”[288] We do not know how far we may credit this
assertion; we know that Charles debased himself by asking and receiving
money from the French monarch, to whom he betrayed the interests of his
allies and of his own kingdom; but, as to having stipulated for the
re-establishment of the Romish religion, we would not be bold enough to
assert that it was so. However it be, this statement is connected with
the famous Popish plot which, in 1678, threw Great Britain into such a
state of alarm and excitement, and which, although it was at first the
cause of many innocent victims beings sacrificed, ultimately produced an
immense and glorious result—the Habeas Corpus Act.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account