History of the Jews in America: From the Period of the Discovery of the New World to the Present TimeWiernik, Peter
History
History of the Jews in America: From the Period of the Discovery of the New World to the Present Time
Wiernik, Peter
Jews -- America -- History; Jews -- United States -- History
It was also about this time that the “Maskilim” or half-Germanized
Hebrew scholars, who were forced to the background by the domination of
the radicals at the beginning of the “Russian period,” began to forge
to the front again. The number of Jews who could read Hebrew was fast
increasing, the proportion of intelligent and well-educated men being
much larger among those who were forced to emigrate than among the
earlier immigrants. Well known Hebrew scholars who arrived in that
period began the publication of Hebrew periodicals, and while none
of the publications survived, some of them existed for a number of
years and exerted a certain influence; besides contributing to develop
the talents of new writers and to lay the foundation for a Neo-Hebrew
literature in America, which is progressing slowly but surely.
One of the first of the Hebrew editors of the new period was Ephraim
Deinard (b. in Courland, 1846; a. 1888), the author and traveler. He
established the weekly “Ha-Leomi” (Nationalist) in New York in 1889,
and it existed for about two years. Another traveler and author, Wolf
(or William) Schur (b. in Utian, Russia, 1844; d. in Chicago, 1910),
established his weekly “Ha-Pisgah” (The Summit), which appeared in New
York and Baltimore in the years 1890–94 and in Chicago in 1897–1900.
The “ha-Ibri” (The Hebrew), also a weekly, was founded by K. H.
Sarasohn and edited by Gerson Rosenzweig (b. in Karatchin, in the
government of Grodno, Russia, 1861; a. 1888) during the time of its
existence, from 1892 to 1898. Of the Hebrew monthlies of that period
only the “Ner he-Maarabi” (Western Light), which appeared in 1895–97,
edited first by Abraham H. Rosenberg (b. in Pinsk, 1838; a. 1891) and
afterwards by Samuel B. Schwarzberg, deserves to be mentioned.
In one respect the Hebrew and the Yiddish writers were struggling
with the same difficulty――that of making themselves understood to the
largest possible number of readers. The method prevailing in Russia,
of writing as hard or using as high a language as possible so that
the highly intelligent reader――the title to which every reader of a
newspaper there at that time laid claim――should take pride in being
able to understand the contents, would not attract readers here as
it does where scarcity of printed matter makes the public accept with
eagerness whatever is offered. But the Hebrew writer came here with
a style that may be termed aristocratic, and the Yiddish writer, who
had to begin everything anew, had hardly any style. It was all easy
as far as the work of the agitator was concerned; denunciations and
accusations are always easily understood, and this alone is one of the
reasons of their popularity. But when it came to the parts where the
writer wanted to describe or to explain, especially in the scientific
or semi-scientific articles which a public that had no systematic
schooling so eagerly devoured, the language of most of the writers was
inadequate and not easily understood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account