History of the Kingdom of Siam and of the revolutions that have caused the overthrow of the empire, up to A.D. 1770 — John Shaqi
History of the Kingdom of Siam and of the revolutions that have caused the overthrow of the empire, up to A.D. 1770Turpin, F. H. (François Henri)
History
History of the Kingdom of Siam and of the revolutions that have caused the overthrow of the empire, up to A.D. 1770
Turpin, F. H. (François Henri)
Thailand -- Description and travel; Thailand -- History
But the fears were allayed next day by a letter from the French
commander, who declared that his intentions were peaceable. Having
explained the reasons for not giving up the hostages, he declared that
he preferred to surrender his rights, rather than to break the
alliance between two powerful Kings and so he sent back the hostages
with a promise to return the ships which had been supplied to him in
good condition. He announced at the same time, the approaching arrival
of the head of the French trading station to settle the accounts and
to repay loans advanced in cases where the value of the merchandise
which had been taken from the warehouse was not enough to pay the
out-standing debts.
The Bishop was released from his fetters on the same day as the
letters were received, and was taken to Court. He was made to walk
through the town barefooted, hatless and in rags. The missionaries
also appeared loaded with fetters.
The presiding official proudly announced that if the French Commander
made the slightest sign of hostilities, all the Christians would be
blown from the cannon's mouth in revenge for his breach of good faith.
M. de Métellopolis was commanded to write to the commander. He obeyed
promptly and although the King and his ministers appeared satisfied
with the missive, they substituted another for it and sealed it
without allowing him to read it. The prisoners were sent back to their
work, pending the receipt of a reply; they were confined in more
spacious quarters, and experienced less discomfort.
Des Farges, anxious to set sail, sent back the last of the hostages
who was very pleased at the kindly treatment he had received. It was
thought that by this means, the prisoners would be able to gain their
liberty, but only the Bishop was released. The others suffering from
the hardships of so lengthy a confinement petitioned for death or
liberty. This announcement produced its expected result. They were
relieved of their bonds and the harsh treatment was somewhat relaxed.
The court proclaimed that it was unlawful to jeer or to make lampoons
on foreigners, and those who interfered with their religion were to be
punished severely.
This first exhibition of clemency aroused hopes of a speedy release,
but the Dutch fearing to see the French restored to favour, spread a
report that France was sending out a punitive expedition against the
Kingdom. The trick was successful; the prisoners were again put in
chains and had no other consolation than to sing hymns. M. Paumard, a
Missionary who was trusted at Court said that the reports spread by
jealous enemies were nothing but absolute falsehoods and the court,
which respected his outspokeness, believed him.
The prisoners were transferred to a neighbouring island whose climate
was as fatal as had been the putrid stench of the prison.
Many died in consequence, and the survivors passed days of continual
suffering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account