History of the Ordinance of 1787 and the Old Northwest Territory: A Supplemental Text for School Use
History
History of the Ordinance of 1787 and the Old Northwest Territory: A Supplemental Text for School Use
Northwest, Old -- History; Northwest, Old -- History -- Bibliography; United States. Ordinance of 1787; United States. Ordinance of 1787 -- Bibliography
However, after the Constitution was submitted to the states for
ratification it quickly became apparent that the people were determined
upon specific provision for the rights of men in their fundamental
law, and while ratification of the Constitution by nine states was
accomplished in 1789, it was only possible by assurance that such
provisions would be immediately added as amendments.
In some form, every one of the states admitted from the Northwest
Territory later embodied similar provisions in their fundamental law. The
adoption or rejection of these principles was not left to the discretion
of the states; being “Articles of Compact,” they could not be discarded
without the consent of Congress.
The sixth article of this compact prohibited slavery forever, within
the bounds of the Northwest Territory. But for this form of compact in
the ordinance, it is perhaps possible that Indiana and Illinois would
have entered the Union as slave states. In 1802 General William Henry
Harrison, then Governor of Indiana Territory, called a convention of
delegates to consider the means by which slavery could be introduced into
the territory, and he himself presided over its deliberations. In the
language of Poole,
“The Convention voted to give its consent to the suspension of the sixth
article of the compact, and to memorialize Congress for its consent to
the same. The memorial laid before Congress stated that the suspension
of the sixth article would be highly ‘advantageous to the Territory’
and ‘would meet with the approbation of at least nine-tenths of the
good citizens of the same.’ The subject was referred to a committee of
which John Randolph of Virginia was chairman, who reported adversely
as follows: ‘That the rapidly increasing population of the State of
Ohio evinces in the opinion of your committee, that the labor of slaves
is not necessary to promote the growth and settlement of colonies in
that region. That this labor, demonstrably the dearest of any, can only
be employed to advantage in the cultivation of products more valuable
than any known in that quarter of the United States; that the committee
deem it highly dangerous and inexpedient to impair a provision wisely
calculated to promote the happiness and prosperity of the northwestern
country, and to give strength and security to that extensive frontier. In
the salutary operation of this sagacious and salutary restraint, it is
believed that the inhabitants of the Territory will, at no very distant
day, find ample remuneration for a temporary privation of labor and of
emigration.’”
When Ohio was admitted to the Union, the advocates of slavery made
strenuous efforts to secure its introduction, but were defeated. Indiana
and Illinois territories later asked that the anti-slavery provision be
set aside. More than one committee reported in favor of repealing it, but
Congress firmly maintained the compact.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account