History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle FramersCurtis, George Ticknor
History
History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle Framers
Curtis, George Ticknor
Constitutional history -- United States
[154] Moved by Mr. Strong, August 15. Ibid. 427. This was brought
forward as an amendment to the article (Art. VI. § 12) which was to
define the powers of the two houses.
[155] August 31. Elliot, V. 503.
[156] Elliot, V. 506, 510, 511, 514. The privilege, as it came from
this committee, was confined to "bills for raising revenue"; and these
were made subject to "alterations and amendments by the Senate."
[157] Ibid. 519.
[158] The history of this provision shows clearly that a bill for
appropriating money may originate in the Senate.
[159] August 9. Elliot, V. 398-401. Massachusetts, Connecticut,
Pennsylvania, and Maryland voted in the negative, and the vote of
North Carolina was divided.
[160] May 31. Elliot, V. 133.
[161] Dickinson, Gerry, Mason.
[162] Sherman, Luther Martin, Ellsworth. On the naked proposition,
moved by Ellsworth, July 2, to allow each State one vote in the
Senate, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, _ay_,
5; Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, _no_, 5; Georgia divided.
[163] Maryland alone voted against it.
[164] This suggestion was made by Hamilton. Elliot, V. 517.
[165] Madison, Hamilton, Wilson, and Read. Elliot, V. 241-245. June
26.
[166] Ibid.
[167] In Horace Walpole's Memoirs of the Reign of George II., there is
an amusing parallel--gravely drawn, however--between the mode in which
his father, Sir Robert, "traded for members," and the manner in which
Mr. Pelham carried on _his_ corruption. Lord Mahon has called Sir
Robert Walpole "the patron and parent of parliamentary corruption."
(Hist. of England, I. 268.) But both Mr. Hallam and Mr. Macaulay say
that it originated under Charles II., and both admit that it was
practised down to the close of the American war. (Hallam's Const.
Hist., III. 255, 256, 351-356. Macaulay's Hist. of England, III.
541-549.) The latter, in a very masterly analysis of its origin and
history, treats it as a local disease, incident to the growth of the
English constitution. It must be confessed, that it had become
_chronic_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account