History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle FramersCurtis, George Ticknor
History
History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle Framers
Curtis, George Ticknor
Constitutional history -- United States
[251] That is to say, it is the same crime, committed on the high
seas, that is denominated robbery when committed on the land.
[252] Madison, Elliot, V. 436, 437.
[253] In the clause as it passed the Convention, the offence of
_counterfeiting_ was placed with the other crimes which Congress was
to "define" and "punish"; but, on the revision of the Constitution,
counterfeiting was placed in a separate clause, under the term "to
provide for the punishment of," &c. See Art. I. § 8, clauses 6, 10.
[254] Elliot, V. 438, 439.
[255] Elliot, V. 440, 510, 511.
[256] Ibid. 442.
[257] Ibid. 443.
[258] Ibid. 440.
[259] Elliot, V. 510, 511. Constitution, Art. 1. § 8, clause 12.
[260] Elliot, V. 443.
[261] Art. VII. § 1 of the first draft. Elliot, V. 379.
[262] Ibid. 440.
[263] Aug 18. Elliot, V. 445.
[264] Constitution, Art. I § 8, cl. 16.
[265] Art. I. § 8, cl. 15. Ibid. p. 467.
[266] Constitution, Art. I. § 8, cl. 18.
[267] Elliot, V. 447.
[268] See the statutes of Massachusetts and Connecticut, &c. cited in
Curtis on Copyright, pp. 77, 78, 79.
[269] _Ante_, Chap. IX.
[270] Elliot, V. 510, 511, 512.
[271] _Ante_, Vol. I. Book III. ch. 5, p. 291 _et seq._
[272] Resolve of October 10, 1780. Journals, VI. 325.
[273] Resolve of April 23, 1784. Journals, IX. 153.
[274] March 16, 1785. Journals, X. 79. See _ante_, Vol. I. p. 299.
[275] See the note on the authorship of the Ordinance of 1787, in the
Appendix to this volume.
[276] _Ante_, Chap. IV. p. 77, note.
[277] See the proceedings concerning Kentucky, in 1788. Journals,
XIII. 16, 32, 51, 52, 55.
[278] The Federalist, No. 38.
[279] The passage quoted from Mr. Jefferson, _ante_, p. 77, also shows
that strong doubts were felt in Congress, in 1784, respecting their
power to admit new States formed out of unoccupied territory. Indeed,
the whole of the proceedings upon Mr. Jefferson's measure of April 23,
1784, show that the powers of Congress over the territory that had
been acquired under the cession of Virginia were very variously
regarded by the different delegates. See Journals, IX. 138-156. The
State of South Carolina voted against the resolve on its final
passage, and after it had been modified to meet some of the objections
raised.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account