History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
However, as the degradation and ruin of an empire cannot be
effected in a moment, or by a single blow; as there still existed
in the Roman world some habits of liberty which despotism had not
had time or need to destroy, it was necessary to make some sort
of compensation for this complete disappearance of political
rights and life; and this compensation naturally resulted from
the change which had occurred.
{186}
Growing Importance Of The Municipia.
A portion of the importance which Rome had lost, had returned to
the _municipia_. A large number of wealthy citizens no
longer left their homes. Having been excluded from the government
of the State, their attention spontaneously turned to the affairs
of their own city. Nothing had yet stimulated the central power
to interfere in their administration. The treasures of Rome, and
the ordinary contributions of the provinces, were sufficient for
the imperial wants, and even for its follies. Tyranny then felt
but slightly the necessity of penetrating into every quarter, and
of possessing a detailed organization; and did not even know how
to set about it. The municipal system, therefore, retained
considerable importance; it even constituted itself with greater
regularity, and according to more positive, perhaps more
extensive rights, than those which it had previously possessed.
It is during the period from the reign of Nerva to that of
Diocletian, that the state of the _municipia_ appears under
this new aspect. A great many laws were passed to increase and
secure the property and revenues of towns. Trajan permitted them
to receive inheritances by way of _fidei commissus;_ and,
ere long, they were authorized to receive them directly. Hadrian
granted them the right of receiving legacies, and ordained that
any administrator who should misappropriate the property of a
town should be considered guilty, not of simple theft, but of
embezzlement. The ordinary income usually sufficed to meet the
expenditure, and it was not necessary to lay fresh taxes upon the
citizens. The State did not cast upon the cities any burdens
which did not directly concern them; and there were but very few
citizens exempt from that which was onerous in municipal duties.
The common people bore their part, by hard labour, in the public
works which interested each town: the dignity of the decurions
was recognised and sanctioned. Hadrian freed them from the
punishment of death, except in cases of parricide. The
decurionate was still sought after as an honour; and lastly, the
best proof of the importance and extension of the municipal
system, during this period, will be found in the number of laws
passed in relation to it, and the particular attention paid to it
by jurisconsults. Evidently, in the absence of political rights
and guarantees, the municipal system was the depository in which
all the rights and securities of citizens were contained.
{187}
Dangers Of Roman Despotism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account