History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
When liberty began to totter at Rome, the decadence of the
political activity of the citizens necessarily diminished its
concentration. The chief men of the _municipia_ repaired to
Rome to take their part in the government of the world, either by
voting in the _comitia_, or discharging great public
functions. When the _comitia_ and the high magistracies
ceased to have any perceptible influence in the government, when
political life became extinct in Rome, together with the movement
of liberty, this affluence of all the important men towards Rome
decreased. Such a decrease was advantageous to the rising
despotism, and met with no opposition.
{185}
Progress Of Public Indifference.
Here, as in every instance, the necessary consequences of general
facts are revealed in particular and positive facts, up to that
time, no political act could be performed, and no suffrage be
exercised, elsewhere than within the walls of Rome. Suetonius
informs us that Augustus conferred upon the citizens of a large
number of Italian _municipia_ the right of giving their
votes without leaving their town, and sending them to Rome in a
sealed packet, that they might be properly scrutinized in the
_comitia_. Thus was exhibited, at once, the progress of
public indifference, and the growth of absolute power.
This progress continued rapidly. Ere long, the _comitia_ met
with the fate of all shams, and were abolished; all free
intervention of the citizens in the government disappeared, and
no political acts remained to be performed, either at Rome, or at
a distance therefrom; and as it is always a trick of nascent
despotism to offer to all men the deceptive advantages of a
shameful equality, the right of Roman citizenship was, almost at
the same period, bestowed indiscriminately upon the whole Roman
world. This right no longer possessed any political significance,
nor did it confer any real importance upon those who received it;
and yet this concession deprived those whom it levelled to the
condition of the multitude, of any importance they might still
have retained. There is reason to believe that this measure was
rather the consequence of a financial speculation than of a
clever despotic combination. But despotism, even when its conduct
is least guided by scientific principles, is never deceived by
its instincts. Such was, moreover, the natural course of things;
and degraded peoples must inevitably suffer their fate. All the
blame must not be laid on the master of the flock; and the hatred
which tyranny merits cannot save from our contempt nations that
are incapable of liberty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account