History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
There is no necessity for me, gentlemen, to offer any very
serious opposition to this fantastic and superstitious adoration
of the past. It would hardly have merited even a passing
allusion, were it not connected with systems and tendencies in
which all society is interested. It is one of the collateral
circumstances of the grand struggle which has never ceased to
agitate the world. The interests and ideas which have
successively taken possession of society have always wished to
render it stationary in the position which has given it over to
their rule; and when it has escaped from them, it has ever, in so
doing, had to withstand those seductive images and influences
which these interests have called to their aid. There is no fear
that the world will allow itself to be thus ensnared:--progress
is the law of its nature; hope, and not regret, is the spring of
its movement:--the future alone possesses an attractive virtue.
Peoples who have emerged from slavery have always endeavoured by
laws to prevent enfranchised man from again falling into
servitude. Providence has not been less careful with regard to
humanity; and the chains which have not sufficed to confine it,
are still less able to resume the grasp which they have lost. But
the efforts of a retrograde system have often perverted the study
of ancient times. The Emperor Julian saw in the popular fables of
Greece a philosophy capable of satisfying those moral necessities
which Christianity had come to satisfy, and he demanded that men
should see and honour in the history of decayed paganism that
which only existed in his dreams.
{9}
The same demands have been made with as little reason on behalf
of the ancient political institutions of Europe. Justice, and
justice alone, is due to that which no longer exists, as well as
to that which still remains. Respect for the past means neither
approbation nor silence for that which is false, culpable, or
dangerous. The past deserves no gratitude or consideration from
us, except on account of the truth which it has known, and the
good which it has aimed at or accomplished. Time has not been
endowed with the unhallowed office of consecrating evil or error;
on the contrary, it unmasks and consumes them. To spare them
because they are ancient, is not to respect the past, but it is
to outrage truth, which is older than the world itself.
The Duty of Impartiality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account