History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe — John Shaqi
History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
national assemblies, had well nigh disappeared; liberty existed
co-ordinately with power; the sovereignty was scattered. This is
the first epoch. [Footnote 1]
[Footnote 1: On this see Guizot's History of Civilization in
France. Lectures vii and viii.]
The Feudal System
The second epoch is that of the feudal system. Three essential
characteristics belong to it; 1st. The reduction of the mass of
the people to slavery or a condition bordering thereon: 2nd. The
hierarchical and federative organization of the feudal
aristocracy, extending in its application both to persons and
lands: 3rd. The almost entire dissolution of the sovereignty,
which then devolved on every feudal proprietor capable of
exercising and defending it; from whence resulted the feebleness
of the royal power and the destruction of monarchical unity,
which disappeared almost as completely as national unity. This
system prevailed until the thirteenth century.
{15}
Progress Of Monarchical Power.
Then commenced a new epoch. The feudal lord, already possessed of
royal power, aspired after royal dignity. A portion of the
inhabitants of the territory, having regained somewhat of the
power they had lost, longed to become free. The feudal
aristocracy was attacked on the one hand by the enfranchisement
of the townsmen and tenants, on the other hand by the extension
of the royal power. Sovereignty tended to concentration, liberty
to diffusion;--national unity began to shape itself at the same
time as monarchical unity appeared. This was at once indicated
and promoted by attempts after a representative form of
government, which were made and renewed during nearly three
centuries, wherever the feudal system fell into decay, or the
monarchical system prevailed. But soon sovereigns also began
almost everywhere to distrust it in their turn. They could not
behold with indifference that sovereignty, which after having
been long diffused had been regained and concentrated by their
efforts, now again divided at its very centre. Besides, the
people were deficient alike in such strength and knowledge as
would enable them to continue, on the one hand, against the
feudal system, a struggle which had not yet ceased, and to
sustain, on the other hand, a new struggle against the central
power. It was evident that the times were not fully matured; that
society, which had not thoroughly emerged from that condition of
servitude which had been the successor of social chaos, was
neither so firmly consolidated nor so mentally disciplined as to
be able to secure at once order by the equitable administration
of power, and liberty by the safeguards of large and influential
public institutions. The efforts after representative government
became more occasional and feeble, and at length disappeared. One
country alone guarded and defended it, and advanced from one
struggle to another, till it succeeded. In other places, the
purely monarchical system prevailed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account