History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
The second of the central institutions of the Anglo-Saxons, was
the kingly office. An important fact has distinguished the
formation of all states of Germanic origin, and this is, the
speedy establishment of hereditary monarchy,--which was the
dominant character of this institution at this period, whatever
mixture of election may be discerned therein. The causes of this
are simple. In warlike tribes, there is, in war at least, a
single chieftain; the man of greatest valour and largest
experience, says to his comrades, "Come with me--I will lead you
where you may obtain rich booty;" his proposition is accepted,
and by common consent he becomes the leader of the expedition.
Thus, at the origin of society, power is not conferred; he who is
able to do so, assumes it by the consent of the others. There is
no election properly so called, but only a recognition of
authority. The leader who has conducted one or more fortunate
expeditions, obtains great importance by success; his influence
increases with time, and he hands down to his family the
influence and power which he has acquired. This family, thus
invested with an actual superiority, gains a natural habit of
command, which the others soon grow accustomed to acknowledge.
Among the Germans, moreover, the idea of religious filiation
contributed powerfully to the establishment of hereditary
monarchy. It was almost a national duty to choose kings from the
divine race; and all the royal families were descendants of Odin.
Thus hereditary monarchy prevailed among these peoples; but
choice among the members of the royal family long existed. It was
indispensably necessary that the king should be a capable man, in
a state of society in which men were as yet ignorant of the
artificial means which supply the deficiencies of royal
incapacity. Thus Alfred himself did not simply found his right to
the throne on a will of his father, and an agreement with his
brother; but he based it especially upon the consent of all the
large proprietors of the kingdom of Wessex. Force sometimes gave
severe checks to hereditary right; but the usurpation of the
throne was always associated with the idea of the violation of a
right, and the usurpers invariably strove to atone for this
violation, by marriage with one of the legitimate race.
{54}
Duties Of The Kings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account