History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
_Secondly_, the individual dependence of territorial
property;
_Thirdly_, the stationary condition of territorial
wealth.
Why the system of beneficiary property, that is to say, the
feudal system, was necessary to the formation of modern society
and of powerful states.
Lecture XVI.--Page 132
Of the state of persons, from the fifth to the tenth century.
Impossibility of determining this, according to any fixed and
general principle.
The condition of lands not always correspondent with that of
persons.
Variable and unsettled character of social conditions.
Slavery.
Attempt to determine the condition of persons according to
the _Wehrgeld_.
Table of twenty-one principal cases of _Wehrgeld_.
Uncertainty of this principle.
The true method of ascertaining the condition of persons.
{xiii}
Lecture XVII.--Page 141
Of the _Leudes_ or Antrustions.
Men, faithful to the king and to the large proprietors.
Different means of acquiring and retaining them.
Obligations of the _Leudes_.
The _Leudes_ are the origin of the nobility.
Bishops and heads of monasteries were reckoned among the
_leudes_ of the king.
Moral and material of the bishops.
Efforts of the kings to possess themselves of the right of
nominating bishops.
Free men.
Did they form a distinct and numerous class?
The _arimanni_, and _rathimburgi_.
Mistake of M. de Savigny.
Rapid and general extension of the feudal hierarchy.
The freedmen.
Different modes of enfranchisement:
_First_, the _denariales_, enfranchised with
respect to the king:
_Second_, the _tabularii_, enfranchised with
respect to the church:
_Third_, the _chartularii_, enfranchised by a
charter.
Different consequences resulting from these different modes
of enfranchisement.
Lecture XVIII.--Page 148
Simultaneous existence of three systems of institutions, after
the settlement of the Franks in Gaul.
Conflict of these three systems.
Summary of this conflict, its vicissitudes, and results.
Its recurrence in local and central institutions.
Of local institutions under the Frankish monarchy.
Of the assemblies of free men.
Of the authority and jurisdiction of the great landowners in
their estates.
Of the authority and jurisdiction of the dukes, counts, and
other royal officers.
Lecture XIX.--Page 154
Government of Charlemagne.
Apparent revival of free institutions.
Individual independence and social liberty.
Organization of monarchical power under Charlemagne.
His active surveillance over his vassals and agents.
Rapid decline of monarchical institutions after his death.
Definitive predominance of the feudal system.
Central institutions during the same epoch: royalty.
Causes of the progress of royalty, and of the principle of
hereditary succession among the Franks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account