History of the Peninsular War, Volume 1 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 1 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Ferdinand therefore now invested Don Pedro de Labrador, honorary
counsellor of state, in whose talents he had great reliance, with
full powers, instructing him to present them to the French minister
for foreign affairs, and to demand his full powers in return, that
the proposals of Buonaparte might be communicated in an authentic
manner. ♦APRIL 27.♦ The instructions given him, which were drawn up
by Cevallos, were to ask M. Champagny if King Ferdinand were at full
liberty? for if he was, he would return to his dominions, and there
give audience to the plenipotentiary whom the Emperor might depute;
if he were not, all acts at Bayonne were nugatory, and could have no
other effect than to stain the reputation of Buonaparte before the
whole world. Ferdinand, he was charged to say, was resolved not to
yield to the Emperor’s demands: neither his own honour, nor his duty
to his subjects, permitting him. He could not compel them to accept of
the Buonaparte dynasty, much less could he deprive them of their right
to elect another family to the throne, when the reigning one should
be extinct. It was not less repugnant to his feelings to accept of
the throne of Etruria as a compensation; that country belonged to its
lawful sovereign, whom he would not wrong, and he was contented with
the kingdom which providence had given him.
♦FERDINAND IS PREVENTED FROM RETURNING.♦
When Labrador presented his powers, and required the usual return,
M. Champagny replied, these things were mere matters of form, and
wholly unconnected with the essential object of which they were to
treat. Buonaparte, indeed, had determined to force from Ferdinand the
form of a voluntary renunciation, but he and his ministers considered
all other forms as useless. The Frenchman proceeded to talk of the
propositions: Labrador declared he could discuss no subject till the
previous formalities had been observed; and asked if the King were at
liberty? M. Champagny made answer, undoubtedly he was. Then, said the
Spaniard, he ought to be restored to his kingdom. But M. Champagny
replied, that, with respect to his return, it was necessary he should
come to a right understanding with the Emperor, either personally
or by letter. Already, Ferdinand had had sufficient reason to feel
himself a prisoner; this language was such as could leave no doubt.
But that the violence might be apparent and notorious, Cevallos ♦APRIL
28.♦ addressed a note to the French minister of state, saying, that
the King had left Madrid with the intention of meeting the Emperor at
Burgos, on the assurances which the Grand Duke of Berg, the ambassador
Beauharnois, and General Savary, had given of his approach; and that,
in consequence of the agitation of the public mind in Spain, it was
impossible to answer longer for the tranquillity of the people,
especially as they were apprized that their King had now been six
days at Bayonne. He had, in the most solemn manner, promised them on
his departure that he would speedily return.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account