History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“There, therefore,” Mr. Windham continued, “I would have collected
the greatest force that this country could by any possibility have
furnished. There was no reason why we might not have had an army of
100,000. An hundred thousand men, with Gibraltar to retreat upon, was a
far less risk to the country than 30,000 in the situation in which the
ministry had placed them; nay, than 30,000 in the very situation spoken
of; because a general must be miserably deficient in knowledge of his
business, who, in such an abundant country, and with such a fortress
behind him, would, with an army of that amount, suffer himself to be
prevented from making good his retreat, by any force which the enemy
could bring against him. For when we talked of Buonaparte’s numbers,
we must recollect where those numbers were to act. To meet in the
south of Spain a British force of 100,000, Buonaparte must bring over
the Pyrenees a force of not less than 200,000; to say nothing of the
demand that would be made upon him by the Spanish army which might be
raised in that part of Spain, to co-operate with the British, and which
the presence of such a British force would help to raise. Buonaparte
would have a whole kingdom, which he must garrison, behind him, if
he would either be sure of his supplies, or make provision against
total destruction, in the event of any reverse. He must fight us at
arm’s-length, while our strength would be exerted within distance, with
an impregnable fortress at hand, furnishing a safe retreat in case of
disaster, and a source of endless supply, by means of its safe and
undisturbable communication with this country. And let it not be said,
that while the army continued in the south, Buonaparte might continue
master of the north. What mastery could he have of any part of Spain,
while such an army could keep on foot in any other? And why, in case
of success, did the security of its retreat require that it should
never advance? There was never any thing so demonstrable, therefore,
as that the only way of carrying on effectually a campaign in Spain,
whatever else you might have done, was to collect your army in the
south. A force raised to the greatest possible amount to which the mind
and means of the country, ... then elevated above itself, and exalted
to something of a preternatural greatness, ... could have carried it,
should have been placed where it would have been safe from the risk
of total loss, and would not have been kept down by the idea that the
deposit was too great for the country to hazard. This should have been
the great foundation, the base line of the plan of the campaign. On
this the country might have given a loose to all its exertions, with
the consolatory reflection, that the greater its exertions, the greater
its security, ... the more it made its preparations effectual to their
purpose, the less was the risk at which it acted.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account