History of the Peninsular War, Volume 4 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 4 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
There was a great majority upon this question, 213 voting for the
grant, 106 against it. But the current of popular opinion in the
metropolis set in with the opposition at this time; for the Walcheren
expedition, like a pestilential vapour, clouded the whole political
♦THE COMMON COUNCIL PETITION AGAINST THE PENSION.♦ horizon. The
common council presented a petition against the pension: a measure so
extraordinary, they said, in the present state of the country, and
under all the afflicting circumstances attending our armies in Spain
and Portugal under that officer’s command, could not but prove highly
injurious in its consequences, and no less grievous than irritating
to the nation at large. In the military conduct of Lord Wellington,
the lord mayor and common council added, they did not recognise any
claims to national remuneration; and they conceived it to be a high
aggravation of the misconduct of his majesty’s unprincipled and
incapable advisers, that they had, in contempt and defiance of public
opinion, recommended this grant to parliament. There was neither
reason nor justice in making it, and therefore they prayed that it
might not pass into a law. When the second reading was moved, Mr.
Whitbread said he trusted that as this petition had been presented,
the minister would not press it that day. Mr. Perceval replied he saw
no necessity for any such forbearance, and the bill passed by a great
majority, 106 dividing against 36.
In these debates ministers were completely triumphant. Some of their
opponents accused them of having done too much, others of having
done too little, and some would fain have persuaded the people of
Great Britain, that our army had obtained no victory at Talavera. The
charge of having taken no measures for conciliating the Spaniards, by
obtaining for them a restoration of those political rights which had
been so long withheld, was abundantly disproved by the papers laid
before parliament. There it appeared that Mr. Stuart, Mr. Frere, and
Marquis Wellesley, had each pressed upon the existing government the
necessity of convoking the Cortes. The great error which the ministry
had committed, was in their neglect of Catalonia. In the commencement
of the struggle this fault was not imputable to them, but to the
general, who disobeyed his instructions to convey his army to that most
important scene of operations: the effects of that fatal error were to
a certain extent irremediable; but no subsequent attempt was made, and
the French were suffered to take fortress after fortress, without an
effort on our part to relieve them. Still the conduct of administration
toward Spain was far more worthy of commendation than of censure; if
not without error, if not always successful, it had uniformly been
brave and generous: we had every motive of policy for assisting the
Spaniards in their struggle, but the assistance was given in a manner
worthy of the nation which gave, and of the noble people who received
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account