History of the Peninsular War, Volume 4 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 4 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Had the Spanish army been even in a tolerable condition, this
cause must have produced the ruin of the French in Catalonia; but
the deserters found that they were exchanging a bad service for a
worse. The French troops, though by a policy not less ruinous than
detestable, left to supply themselves as they could, were, even at the
worst, better provided than the Spaniards in their best state. They
had always the benefit of system, regularity, and order; while the
Spaniards suffered as much from the confusion which insubordination
and the total want of method occasioned, as from neglect on the part
of the local authorities and the provincial government. Owing to these
combined causes their armies were often in a state of destitution.
Unanimous as Spain was in its feeling of indignant abhorrence at the
insolent usurpation which Buonaparte had attempted, it was divided
against itself whenever provincial interests appeared to clash. Neither
Catalonia nor Valencia would at this time make common cause with
Arragon, although they were engaged with the same passionate feeling,
for the same object, against the same enemy, and although their own
safety was immediately involved in the fate of that kingdom. The
Arragonese army consisted of about 13,000 men in three divisions, one
of which was near Teruel, another near Tortosa, and the third on the
line of the Cinca; the men were without pay, without arms, without
clothing; the officers on a fourth part of their appointments. Twenty
thousand men would eagerly have joined that army, if they could have
been armed and fed; the people had given abundant proof of their zeal,
and spirit, and devotion, and the army had done its duty: yet Valencia
would spare them none of its own ample resources, and the Catalan
government even stopped the supplies which were intended for Arragon.
The Arragonese felt this the more indignantly, because, while Lazan
was at their head, his rank and influence ensured some attention to
his representations on their behalf; but Lazan, whether or not justly,
had been arrested, as being implicated in the intrigues of Montijo and
D. Francisco Palafox, and was kept a close prisoner in Peñiscola. The
judge who officially inquired into his conduct declared that there was
not the slightest proof ♦1810. FEBRUARY.♦ against him; and upon the
overthrow of the Central Junta, Saavedra dispatched an order for his
liberation; but the Junta of Valencia, with that order in their hands,
detained him in strict confinement.
♦NEGLECT OF THE VALENCIAN GOVERNMENT.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account