History of the Peninsular War, Volume 5 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 5 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Thus having admitted that public opinion was the proper and
indispensable check upon the proceedings of Government, the Cortes
instituted a board nominated by Government to be a check upon public
opinion, which, if the measure had not been merely nugatory, would
have virtually destroyed the freedom it pretended to establish. But
they were dealing with no easy subject. ♦STATE OF THE PRESS.♦ The
press, like other prisoners, had broken loose when the old system
was overthrown. It had effected the momentous service of rousing the
nation, and it continued to keep up the spirit which it had excited;
but as for exercising any salutary restraint upon the proceedings of
the Government, this was of all things what the public writers were
least competent to do, and the men in power least likely to tolerate.
The danger was, that the press might now, at the same time, inflame
and misdirect the public mind; a work for which eager volunteers are
never wanting in such times. The Spaniards had taken arms to defend
their institutions, to which with all their enormous abuses the people
were devoutly attached. The best and wisest men wished to reform
those abuses. Such men were few, and aiming only at what was lawful
and just, they scrupled at any evil means for bringing it about. The
party who were for destroying root and branch had no such principle to
impede them. Despotism had made them republicans, and an abominable
superstition had driven them into unbelief. They also were few, but
they were more numerous than men whose opinions rested upon a safer
ground; they were bold and they were indefatigable, acting like some
of the early propagandists and victims of the French revolution, in
the enthusiastic belief that nothing but good could result from the
subversion of corrupted establishments. Even in the Cortes there were
some who looked to the most dreadful stage of that revolution rather
as an example than a warning. One member wished for what he called a
Christian Robespierre to save the country; another, for _un pequeño
Robespierre_, one who would carry on a system of terror ♦DIARIO DE LAS
CORTES, T. 2. 441. T. 4. 371.♦ with a little more moderation than had
been used in France; caustics they said were called for; matters must
be carried on with energy and with blood, or the country was lost;
heads must be stricken off, and that speedily; it was necessary to shed
more Spanish blood than French. When such language was uttered in the
Cortes, and circulated in the diaries of that assembly, it was, indeed,
most necessary that efficient measures should be taken for restraining
the license of the press. A journal was published under the ♦EL
ROBESPIERRE ESPAÑOL.♦ title of “The Spanish Robespierre,” breathing the
same spirit as these speeches. One of its numbers was suppressed: the
fanatical author exclaimed against this as an outrage upon the sacred,
the divine, the omnipotent liberty of the press. “I swear,” said he,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account