History of the Protestants of France, from the commencement of the Reformation to the present timeFélice, G. de (Guillaume)
History
History of the Protestants of France, from the commencement of the Reformation to the present time
Félice, G. de (Guillaume)
Protestants -- France
The 21st of August, 1560, had been fixed for the opening of the
assembly. The young king took his seat on the throne, in the great
hall of the palace of Fontainebleau, having near him his wife, Mary
of Scotland, the queen-mother, and his brothers. Cardinals, bishops,
members of the privy council, knights of the order, masters of the
requests, the dukes of Guise and Aumale, the Constable, the Admiral,
the Chancellor, all were there, except the Bourbon princes, who,
fearing a snare, had refused to be present.
The Duke de Guise gave an account of the administration of the
army, the Cardinal de Lorraine of that of the finances. But,
notwithstanding the importance of these matters, the Notables
bestowed little attention upon them: they felt that the sole great
affair of the moment was the religious question.
Coligny had promised the Reformers to give the signal. On a sudden,
he rose, approached the throne, made a respectful obeisance,
and presented two petitions, one to the king, the other to the
queen-mother bearing this inscription: “_The supplication of those,
who, in divers provinces, invoke the name of God according to the
rule of piety._” All present were astonished at such boldness; for
the penalty of death hung always over the head of the heretics. But
the king, François II., who could not have been taught his lesson
beforehand, on this emergency graciously received the petitions, and
handed them to be read, to his secretary.
The faithful attested that their faith was that of the creed of the
Apostles, that they had always acted as loyal subjects of the king,
and that they had been most shamefully calumniated by the accusation
of being fautors of disturbance and sedition. “The Gospel, which
we profess, teaches us just the contrary,” said they; “and we even
do not hesitate to confess, that we never understood so well our
duty towards your majesty as we have understood it by means of the
holy doctrine that is preached to us.” In conclusion, they asked
permission to meet in open day, and submitted to be treated as
rebels, if they should thenceforth be found meeting by night, or
unlawfully.
It was remarked, that these documents were unsigned. “It is true,”
answered the Admiral; “but give us leave to assemble, and, in one
day, I will bring fifty thousand signatures from the province of
Normandy alone.” “And I,” interrupted the Duke de Guise, in an
arrogant tone, “will find a hundred thousand who will sign the
reverse with their blood.”
The debates were resumed on the 23rd of August.
Two prelates—it is a pleasure to state it—Jean de Montluc, bishop
of Valence, and Charles de Marillac, archbishop of Vienne, proposed
means of conciliation. Both had filled embassies in Italy, and
visited the Protestant countries. It is a memorable fact, that the
bishops of France, who had compared Rome and the Reformation, should
have generally inclined to the new ideas!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account