History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 6 (of 8)Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 6 (of 8)
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
Many destructive
agencies were at work in Scotland; loud lamentations were heard. One
thing alone could save the country--the Gospel.
[Sidenote: ALLEGED WILL OF JAMES V.]
The king being dead, it appeared to Beatoun that the public troubles
offered him a favorable opportunity for becoming master, for securing
the triumph of the French party, for abolishing the Reformation, and
establishing the supremacy of the clergy. Since Scotland was abased,
he was to be exalted. It was needful to act quickly. The nobles who
were recently made prisoners, and those who had for a long time lived
in exile in England, were about to return. The cardinal knew well that
they detested his subservience to the pope, his ambition, and his
arrogance; and he had no doubt that they would vigorously oppose him.
The earl of Arran, next heir after Mary to the crown, was it is true
in Scotland, and seemed to be called to make head against him; but the
haughty cardinal made little account of that. The earl is unambitious,
said he; he has no energy, and all his wish is to have nothing to do.
Besides, Arran was his near relation, a son of one of his aunts.[268]
The king had scarcely breathed his last when the cardinal went boldly
to the queen-mother at Linlithgow, fortified with the document on
which he assumed to found his pretensions. ‘Welcome, my lord,’ said
the queen, who as yet knew nothing more than the serious illness of
her husband; ‘is not the king dead?’ Mary of Guise supposed that the
first prelate of the kingdom was come solely to announce to her the
sovereign’s death. But Beatoun had another end in view in this visit.
Without loss of time he produced the king’s testament containing the
nomination of a regency composed of the cardinal and the earls of
Argyle, Huntley, and Murray, the first-named to be president of the
council and guardian to the royal infant. This document was generally
considered to have been extorted from the dying king. Many persons
even believed that the cardinal’s agent had guided the hand of the
dead king, and obtained a signature in blank which the cardinal
had afterwards filled up at his own will. Buchanan states that the
cardinal, having gained over a certain priest named Balfour, had with
his assistance forged a false testament. Knox, Sadler, and Lesley
also speak in the same way.[269] At the market-cross at Edinburgh the
cardinal had proclamation made, on the Monday after the king’s death,
of the alleged deed which made him the first personage in the realm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account