History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 7 (of 8)Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 7 (of 8)
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
CHAPTER XX.
CALVIN AT RATISBON.
(1541.)
Calvin had at this time anxieties of another kind, which may well have
contributed to make the republic of Geneva preferable to the Germanic
empire as a residence. When the conference was broken off at Worms in
1541, he had been elected deputy to the assembly of Ratisbon. It was
with reluctance that he went there, either because he felt that he was
no diplomatist, and did not consider himself at all fit for business of
that kind,[52] or because he anticipated that his stay at Ratisbon would
occasion him much annoyance. He was doubtless hoping always for the
final victory of Jesus Christ, the theme of his song of triumph; but the
conferences which he had already attended, the prolixities, the
questions of mere form which arose, the direction which the Reformation
seemed to be taking, all this disquieted and offended him. He had not
gone to these Germanic assemblies with any large expectations or
ready-made plans. He had no doubt that the Protestant divines would seek
to extend the kingdom of Christ, but he saw more clearly than they did
the obstacles which they would encounter. Many things afflicted and
irritated him; and, perhaps, he could not at all times control his
temper. The Catholics, it is true, made some [Sidenote: Concessions of
the Lutherans.] concessions on important points; but even this failed to
tranquillize Calvin, nay, it excited his suspicions, as it did those of
Luther and the Elector of Saxony. Dr. Eck, who was one of the
commissioners, was not a man to inspire much confidence in Calvin. The
latter would sometimes speak rather hard words about him. This
theologian had had an apoplectic fit, the consequence, it was rumored,
of his intemperance, but he was gradually recovering. ‘The world,’ wrote
Calvin to Farel, ‘does not yet deserve to be delivered from this
brute.’[53] He acknowledged the pacific sentiments of Cardinal
Contarini, the papal legate, who at the same time that he was a
thorough-going Catholic so far as the Church was concerned, leaned
towards reconciliation with the Protestants with respect to matters of
faith. But Calvin, who assuredly saw more clearly than others, did not
doubt that the Roman dignitary really wished to bring back Protestants
into the pale of the Church. The only difference which he perceived
between him and the nuncio Morone was this—Contarini wishes to subdue
us, but without shedding our blood; he tries to gain his end by all
means except by fighting, while Morone is altogether sanguinary, and has
always war on his lips.[54] Calvin instituted a contrast between Morone
and Contarini. The former is a man of blood, the latter a man of peace.
Is it just to say that he hated Contarini?[55] We think not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account