History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 2 — John Shaqi
History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 2Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
History
History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 2
Merle d'Aubigné, J. H. (Jean Henri)
Reformation
"Blessed Father! will your Blessedness deign to turn your
paternal ears, which are like those of Christ himself,
towards your poor sheep and kindly listen to its bleat. What
shall I do, Most Holy Father! I am unable to bear the
fierceness of your anger, and know not how to escape from
it. I am asked to retract, and would hasten to do so could
it lead to the end which is proposed by it. But, owing to
the persecutions of my enemies, my writings have been
circulated far and wide, and are too deeply engraven on
men's hearts to be effaced. A recantation would only add to
the dishonour of the Church of Rome, and raise an universal
cry of accusation against her. Most Holy Father! I declare
before God and all his creatures, that I have never wished,
and do not now wish, either by force or guile, to attack the
authority of the Roman Church or of your Holiness. I
acknowledge that there is nothing in heaven or on the earth
which ought to be put above this Church, unless it be Jesus
Christ the Lord of all."[30]
[30] Præter unum Jesum Christum Dominum omnium. (L. Ep. i, p. 234.)
These words might seem strange and even reprehensible in the mouth of
Luther, did we not reflect that the light did not break in upon him
all at once, but by slow and progressive steps. They show, and this is
very important, that the Reformation was not simply an opposition to
the papacy. Its accomplishment was not effected by warring against
this or that form, or by means of this or that negative tendency.
Opposition to the pope was only one of its secondary features. Its
creating principle was a new life, a positive doctrine--"Jesus Christ,
the Lord of all and paramount to all--to Rome herself," as Luther says
in the conclusion of his letter. To this principle the revolution of
the 16th century is truly to be ascribed.
[Sidenote: LUTHER AGAINST SEPARATION.]
It is probable that at an earlier period a letter from the monk of
Wittemberg, positively refusing to retract, would not have been
allowed by the pope to pass without animadversion. But Maximilian was
dead, the topic of engrossing interest was the election of his
successor, and amid the political intrigues which then agitated the
pontifical city, Luther's letter was overlooked.
The Reformer was employing his time to better purpose than his
powerful antagonist. While Leo X, engrossed by his interests as a
temporal prince, was straining every nerve to prevent a dreaded
neighbour from reaching the Imperial throne, Luther was daily growing
in knowledge and in faith. He studied the Decretals of the popes, and
made discoveries which greatly modified his views. Writing Spalatin he
says, "I am reading the Decretals of the popes, and, let me say it in
your ear, I know not whether the pope is Antichrist himself or only
his apostle;[31] to such a degree in these Decretals is Christ
outraged and crucified."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account