History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal EngineersConnolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
History
History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal Engineers
Connolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Sappers and Miners
Siege of Fort Boyer—Alertness of company on passage to New
Orleans—Return of the sappers from North America—Services and
movements of companies in Canada—Also in Nova Scotia—Captures of
Martinique and Guadaloupe—Services and movements of companies in
Italy—Maltese sappers disbanded—Pay of Sub-Lieutenants—Ypres—Increase
to sappers' force in Holland; its duties and detachments; notice of
sergeant Purcell—Renewal of the war—Strength of the corps sent to the
Netherlands—Pontoneers—Battle of Waterloo—Disastrous situation of a
company in retreating—General order about the alarm and the
stragglers—Sergeant-major Hilton at Brussels—Notice of lance-corporal
Donnelly—Exertions of another company in pressing to the
field—Organization of the engineer establishment in France—Pontoon
train—Magnitude of the engineer establishment; hired drivers; Flemish
seamen—Assault of Peronne, valour of Sub-lieutenant Stratton and
lance-corporal Councill—Pontoon bridges on the Seine—Conduct of corps
during the campaign—Corporal Coombs with the Prussian army—Usefulness
of the sappers in attending to the horses, &c., of the department in
France—Domiciliary visit to Montmartre.
In February of this year nine men were present at the siege of Fort
Boyer, near Mobile, and their services on the occasion have been cited
as a remarkable proof of the utility of the corps. Sir Charles Pasley
thus writes concerning the party:—“The first night of the operations
soldiers of the line only were employed. From a want of skill and
experience in the nature of the duties required of them, and there being
very few engineer officers to direct, they collected in groups, instead
of being spread out as they ought to have been. Consequently, out of one
small party of twenty men, fourteen were killed and wounded by a single
discharge of grape-shot; and such confusion ensued, that very little
progress was made in the course of that night. On the second night of
the siege, the small party of sappers was employed in addition to the
troops of the line. By the assistance of these few men the officers of
engineers were enabled to regulate their working party to so much
advantage, that before morning they had completed a parallel of 200
yards in extent within 50 yards of the enemy’s works, besides approaches
in advance, which, being filled with sharpshooters, the Americans were
unable to show themselves at their guns, and the fort surrendered. It is
proper to explain, that as the army sailed from the Mississippi in
divisions, the main body of the royal engineer department had not
arrived at the period of the attack. The nine men who so particularly
distinguished themselves happened to be on the spot before the others,
because, being all carpenters by trade, they had been lent to the
Admiral to repair the boats of the fleet.”[216] One private was
wounded.[217]
-----
Footnote 216:
Pasley’s ‘Elementary Fortification,’ i., note D, p. x.
Footnote 217:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account