History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal EngineersConnolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
History
History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal Engineers
Connolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Sappers and Miners
Influenced by these considerations, Colonel Green submitted the
suggestion to the Governor and Lieutenant-Governor of Gibraltar. Too
well aware themselves of the disadvantages of the system of _civil_
labour in carrying on the works of The fortress, they were favourable to
the trial of any experiment that promised success; and in recommending
the plan to the attention of the Secretary of State, they expressed
their decided opinion that many advantages would certainly arise to the
service and the fortress by its adoption. The royal consent was
accordingly given to the measure in a Warrant, under the sign manual,
dated 6th March, 1772; and thus originated the corps, whose history is
attempted to be traced in these pages.
The Warrant authorized the raising and forming of a company of
artificers to consist of the following numbers and ranks, with the
regimental pay annexed to each rank:—
s. d.
1 Sergeant and as adjutant[1] 3 0 a-day.
3 Sergeants, each 1 6 ”
3 Corporals 1 2 ”
60 Privates, or working men skilled in the ”
following trades:—Stone-cutters,
masons, miners, lime-burners,
carpenters, smiths, gardeners, or
wheelers, each 0 10
1 Drummer 0 10 ”
——
68 Total.
And officers of the corps of engineers were appointed to command this
new body, to which was given the name of “The Soldier-Artificer
Company.”[2]
-----
Footnote 1:
The rank of sergeant and adjutant—an odd combination certainly—was not
adopted. The senior non-commissioned officer was styled
sergeant-major. The authority for this are the muster rolls and
returns of the company. But it is not a little remarkable that, in
opposition to the fact, evidence should exist of the best kind for
veracity, to oppose the averment. The error appears on a tablet built
in Charles the Fifth’s wall adjoining Hargrave’s parade at Gibraltar,
to the memory of the widow of the first sergeant-major of the corps.
Thus runs the epitaph:—
To the Memory of MARTHA, wife of
THOMAS BRIDGES, Sergeant, and as Adjutant
to His Majesty’s Artificers' Company.
She departed this life, 4th February, 1773,
Aged 38 years.
-------
A more loving wife or friend sincere
Never will be buried here—
Charitable she was to all,
Altho' her income it was small.
Excuse the stanza. Perhaps the sergeant-major was a tetchy man,
obstinate in maintaining his rights, and took this private opportunity
of asserting his warranted rank and publishing the military anomaly in
imperishable marble.
Footnote 2:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account